1 of 3

What you may want to consider doing is capturing stderr to variable, and afterwards checking if it's not empty. Consider the example below:

$ foo=$(stat /etc/passwd 2>&1  > /dev/tty )
  File: /etc/passwd
  Size: 1710        Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: fd00h/64768d    Inode: 537594      Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2019-03-08 15:28:10.481688274 -0700
Modify: 2019-03-08 15:28:10.333669255 -0700
Change: 2019-03-08 15:28:10.341670283 -0700
 Birth: -
$ test "x$foo" = "x" && echo "empty"

Command substitution $(...) runs a subshell and captures stdout only, hence we want to duplicate the file descriptor 1 onto 2 2>&1 so that stderr now can be captured by command substitution, however we still want to see normal output on screen, hence afterwards we point stdout at the controlling terminal /dev/tty.

Now, what if we actually capture stderr into the variable ?

$ foo=$(stat nonexistent.txt 2>&1  > /dev/tty )
$ test "x$foo" = "x" && echo "empty" || echo "not empty"
not empty
$ printf "<Arbitrary Text>%s\n" "$foo"
<Arbitrary Text>stat: cannot stat 'nonexistent.txt': No such file or directory

As you can see the because stderr is captured we can wrap arbitrary text around it as we wish. The main reason for using a variable is that standard shell methods such as pipeline and command substitution operate on stdout file descriptor 1, so there's not a lot we can do to parse stderr on the fly. Of course, we could use a named pipe and redirect to it as stat foobar.txt 2> /tmp/named_pipe.fifo, but the problem with that is blocking - information sent to pipes is buffered until consumed by another process, so your shell script will be stuck. Of course, this could be handled via starting a background process, but IMHO it's more complexity than necessary, and doing multiple processes is far better done in a programming language like Python where you can actually directly access multiprocessing calls.

Side note: test and [ are the same command, so you could just as well write [ "x$foo" = "x" ] and use that in a more elaborate if-else statement