exec system call of the Linux kernel understands shebangs (
I hadn't noticed that OP asked about AIX, I'm going to say what I know about Linux, and bet that there are strong analogies, or at least satisfy the majority of Googlers who are looking for Linux :-)
When you do on bash:
on Linux, this calls the
exec system call with the path
This line of the kernel gets called on the file passed to
if ((bprm->buf != '#') || (bprm->buf != '!'))
It reads the very first bytes of the file, and compares them to
If the comparison is true, then the rest of the line is parsed by the Linux kernel, which makes another
exec call with path
/usr/bin/env python and current file as the first argument:
/usr/bin/env python /path/to/script.py
and this works for any scripting language that uses
# as a comment character.
And yes, you can make an infinite loop with:
printf '#!/a\n' | sudo tee /a
sudo chmod +x /a
Bash recognizes the error:
-bash: /a: /a: bad interpreter: Too many levels of symbolic links
#! just happens to be human readable, but that is not required.
If the file started with different bytes, then the
exec system call would use a different handler. The other most important built-in handler is for ELF executable files: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v4.8/fs/binfmt_elf.c#L1305 which checks for bytes
7f 45 4c 46 (which also happens to be human readable for
.ELF). Let's confirm that by reading the 4 first bytes of
/bin/ls, which is an ELF executable:
head -c 4 "$(which ls)" | hd
00000000 7f 45 4c 46 |.ELF|
So when the kernel sees those bytes, it takes the ELF file, puts it into memory correctly, and starts a new process with it. See also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8352535/how-does-kernel-get-an-executable-binary-file-running-under-linux/31394861#31394861
Finally, you can add your own shebang handlers with the
binfmt_misc mechanism. For example, you can add a custom handler for
.jar files. This mechanism even supports handlers by file extension. Another application is to transparently run executables of a different architecture with QEMU.
I don't think POSIX specifies shebangs, however: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/346214/32558, although it does mention it in rationale sections, and in the form "if executable scripts are supported by the system something may happen".