I just inherited a system and I am trying to understand it's partition table for the hard drive.

machine:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250000000000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30394 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000080

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *           1       30064   241489048+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda2           30065       30394     2650725    5  Extended
/dev/sda5           30065       30394     2650693+  fd  Linux raid autodetect

Why does the numbering go from 1 to 2 to 5. "What is on" sda2 and sda5?

  • 1
    For further reference you may be interested in Wikipedia's articles on MBR and extended (partition) boot records.
    – user
    Jul 21, 2013 at 22:23
  • Note that this is the default partitioning scheme for Debian (Stretch or 9) when using "Guided partitioning" with the "All files in one partition" option.
    – bernie
    Nov 6, 2018 at 19:57

1 Answer 1


On Linux, traditional DOS-partitions will show up this way:

  • Partitions from 1 to 4 are primary partitions.
  • Partitions above 5 are logical partitions.

In the DOS-partitioning-scheme (this is not Linux-specific), if you want to use logical partitions you have to define a pointer within one of the primary partitions for these. At this pointer the BIOS will find further information.

This pointer (sda2 in your machine) shows in fdisk as id 5 "Extended" - it extends the partitioning-scheme to more than the default 4 partitions normally possible.

Now your system consists of two partitions:

One primary, bootable partition: sda1 (which was or is part of a linux-raid-array) and one logical partition: sda5 (which was or is part of a linux-raid-array).

There is no place left for additional partitions.

  • 1
    Technically it contains 2 primary partitions and one logical partition.
    – jordanm
    Jul 21, 2013 at 4:12
  • @jordanm Right - I corrected my answer accordingly - I knew I was missing the right term here...
    – Nils
    Jul 21, 2013 at 21:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.