In mutt, I'm trying to write formatted emails, but the pre-processing step that converts markdown to HTML is mangling the previous messages.

I'm using this answer to convert my messages to HTML.

In mutt, I can write a message literally like this:

Dear A

# Summary of changes

1. Item 1
2. Item 2


and it ends up formatted as you'd expect. A sees B's well-formatted html.

Unfortunately, this mangles the reply thread, since markdown uses whitespace differently than the sender probably did. In addition the reply thread is rendered to white-space+text, rather than retaining markdown/html markup.

To see this, if B replies using the Mutt/HTML/Markdown tricks, pandoc will interpret the quoted text strangely, and mangle the reply text.

The result after B->A->B looks like (I had to edit a bit to remove emails and such, but the it's basically spot on)

You mangled my reply, you twit, people do read the chain sometimes, you know

On Tue, May 4, 2021, 3:49 PM A <a> wrote:                                                           
> B,
> I can do that too!                                                                                                                     
> With formatting!                                                                                                                   
>    1. One-again                                                                                                                    
>    2. Two-again                                                                                                                    
> --A                                                                                                                                   
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:48:21PM -0700, B <b> wrote: >                                                             
> > Summary of Changes > > > 1. Item 1 > > 2. Item 2 > > > >                                                              


Is it possible (and how can I) edit in markdown, convert my message to HTML, and either attach prev replies unchanged, or (ideally) in-line previous replies unchanged.

  • I appreciate the irony of complaining about mangled reply chains while top-posting. But, in short: 1. you can't stop other people mangling stuff in their replies. 2. un-mangling stuff after it has been mangled is extremely difficult to do reliably. 3. why not just send plaint-text/markdown emails wrapped in <pre> and </pre>? - HTML doesn't belong in email, anyway :-)
    – cas
    May 5, 2021 at 6:37
  • Sorry, my question wasn't clear. For (1) and (2), the issue is I want to be a good citizen and not mangle others' replies. I can't help what they did, as you say. I'll edit. May 5, 2021 at 15:37
  • And to address (3), you're right, this probably is not worth it. May 5, 2021 at 15:39


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .