When I run:

TZ=Asia/Kolkata date --date="1/1/1906"

I get:

date: invalid date ‘1/1/1906’

Here I can find a good article on that: Calcutta Time

But the confusion also comes from the fact that 1905 was a valid date. Only 1906 wasn't. Any clue why?


1 Answer 1


According to the time zone database (which gives references to other sources), on January 1, 1906, the local time¹ in Kolkata changed from an offset of 5:21:10 (“Madras time”) to an offset of 5:30 (India Standard Time), which means 8 minutes and 50 seconds were “lost” between December 31, 1905, and January 1, 1906. The latter starts at 00:08:50.

$ TZ=Asia/Kolkata date --date="1/1/1906 00:08:49"
date: invalid date ‘1/1/1906 00:08:49’
$ TZ=Asia/Kolkata date --date="1/1/1906 00:08:50"
Mon  1 Jan 00:08:50 IST 1906

Specifying the date only defaults to 00:00:00, which is invalid.

This happens whenever local time skips forward, e.g. when local time switches from “winter time” to “summer time” (or daylight savings time):

$ TZ=Europe/Paris date --date="03/29/2020 02:30"
date: invalid date ‘03/29/2020 02:30’

¹ For the time zone database’s purposes, “local time” here is defined as “railway time”, i.e. the time used for train timetables in the locality’s railway stations, and other railway-related events. See the India section of the database for Asia for details.

The time zone database considers that Wikipedia’s “Calcutta Time” (5:53:20) was used until 1870, when railway stations changed to Madras time. To add to the confusion, the time zone database refers to 5:53:20 as “Howrah Mean Time” (with some doubt), and “Calcutta Time” is defined with an offset of 5:53:28, in use until June 28, 1854 (again, for railway purposes).

  • 7
    It might be worth noting that this is an extremely common occurrence, with many countries changing offset twice a year (so-called "Daylight Savings Time"), but often pick the date and time of changeover carefully so that the "missing" time is less likely to be encountered.
    – IMSoP
    Sep 11, 2020 at 8:25
  • @IMSoP that’s a good point, I’ve added that to the answer, thanks! Sep 11, 2020 at 8:50
  • 1
  • 1
    @IMSoP, in this case, I suspect it was a change from solar time to zoned time.
    – Mark
    Sep 11, 2020 at 22:21
  • 5
    Work with timezones in your code, they said. It will be fun, they said.
    – DeepSpace
    Sep 12, 2020 at 10:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .