I have a headless server running Debian 10 with Samba 4.9.5. On it I want to share a folder where any user has full read/write access. Here is my entire smb.conf file:

workgroup = WORKGROUP
netbios name = MyServerName
security = user
map to guest = bad user
guest account = myuser
dns proxy = no
log level = 4

path = /home/myuser/share
force user = myuser
force group = myuser
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
write list = myuser
read only = no

myuser has read / write access for all files and read / write / execute access for all folders in /home/myuser/share. However, some of the files don't have write access for their group or other permissions. i.e. their permissions are 755, 644, etc.

For whatever reason, those files and folders are not writable by any client that connects to the share, even though I have force user set to myuser.

I also just noticed that map to guest doesn't seem to be working correctly either. If I connect with an invalid user name, it rejects it rather than mapping it to the myuser account and allowing access to Stuff.

Could someone help me figure out why this isn't working?

I did search around for similar questions and found this: How to create a Samba share that is writable from Windows without 777 permissions, but the accepted solution there is to use force user, which is precisely what I'm doing, but for some reason it's still not working.

  • Does myuser have access to the file and directories? Also, add the output of grep -B3 browseable /etc/samba/smb.conf to your question. – Nasir Riley Jul 23 '20 at 19:24
  • @NasirRiley Yes, I stated in my question that myuser has full access to all of the files and folders in the shared directory. Also, I included my entire smb.conf file in my question, so no need to add the output of grep; you can see that the share has browseable = yes. (I did edit the question to make it more clear that this is more entire smb.conf file.) – GuyGizmo Jul 23 '20 at 19:54
  • Does it say browseable = yes under [homes] in /etc/samba/smb.conf? That's why I asked you add the output of grep -B3 browseable /etc/samba/smb.conf to your question. – Nasir Riley Jul 23 '20 at 20:09
  • @NasirRiley There is no [homes] section in /etc/samba/smb.conf. What I included in my question is the entire contents of the file. – GuyGizmo Jul 23 '20 at 20:13
  • There should be more than that in /etc/samba/smb.conf. I have Samba installed on a Debian 10 VM right now and it has far more than what you have. – Nasir Riley Jul 23 '20 at 20:24

OK, have you created users with 'smbpasswd -a username' (needs to be run as root) ? If you haven't, then your guest account 'myuser' will not work. This means that no one will be able to access your share. Authentication (based on your smb.conf) works like this: A user connects to Samba and if the user is known and supplies the correct password, they are allowed access to your share, but anything they save will be saved as if belonging to 'myuser', but they will be able to read and write files. If they are a known user, but supply a wrong password, then the connection is silently dropped. Because you have 'map to guest = bad user' in global and 'guest ok = yes' in the share, an unknown user that connects to Samba will be mapped to the guest account 'myuser' before it gets anywhere near the share and as they are now a known user, they will be allowed access to the share. As for the smb.conf being too short, well, yours could be even shorter. You do not need the 'force group' line, the 'force user' will do that for you, also as 'myuser' has write permissions by default, you do not need the 'write list' line. Finally, you never need to set 'browseable = yes' anywhere, it is a default setting.

  • While this 'answer' may contain some useful tips for the OP and readers, it doesn't seem to attempt to answer the question at hand. – Parker Kemp Nov 25 '20 at 19:59
  • Yes it does, unless 'myuser' is a valid Unix user, guest access will not work and if it is a valid user, all files will end up belonging to 'myuser'. I also take it that, as the question was answered months ago, the user has fixed his problem. Surely he would said if he didn't understand. – Rowland Penny Nov 27 '20 at 19:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.