I'm having difficulties running a .sh script when I plug in a Bluetooth keyboard.

I'm using the following udev rule:

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="bluetooth", RUN+="./scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh" 

The script doesn't appear to be activated when I connect my keyboard. I have also tried "./scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh", "/bin/bash /scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh", and "sh /scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh". I don't understand why this script is not activated.

If I instead use the following udev rule

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="bluetooth", RUN+="/bin/mkdir /home/joe/tempfolder" 

Then the folder /home/joe/tempfolder is created when I connect the keyboard.

I have saved the rule in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-addicleverkeybindings.sh. The permissions etc. are: -rw-r--r-- 1 joe root 80 Aug 11 19:53 50-addicleverkeyboard.rules.

The script that I'm trying to run is the following:


sleep 1

    xinput list |
    sed -n 's/.*iClever IC-BK06 Keyboard  .*id=\([0-9]*\).*keyboard.*/\1/p'
[ "$remote_id" ] || exit

xkbcomp -i $remote_id /scripts/icleverlayout.xkb $DISPLAY

And ls -la gives -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe root 222 Aug 11 20:00 icleverkeybindings.sh.

If I call simply /scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh from the terminal this works fine.

The script changes the key bindings for my keyboard, I added in the pause in case somehow the script was getting called before xinput knew the keyboard was there, and I added in cheese just to make sure that I knew if it was definitely getting called or not.

Can anyone advise me on how to change my rule so that the script is called?

Thank you

EDIT: To clarify, I created a folder /scripts/, so /scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh is the absolute filepath

  • what is the full path of ./scripts directory? .... do you have a /scripts directory in your filesystem? – jsotola Aug 11 '19 at 19:34
  • 1. You have use a full path to ./scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh. 2. Make sure it has executable bit set. – Arkadiusz Drabczyk Aug 11 '19 at 19:42
  • /scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh is the full path. does 'make sure the executable bit is set' mean 'run chmod +x ' on the script? because I did that – Joe Aug 11 '19 at 20:33
  • I've converted my previous comment to answer. – Arkadiusz Drabczyk Aug 11 '19 at 20:33
  • @Joe: yes, it means that – Arkadiusz Drabczyk Aug 11 '19 at 20:34

As it says in man udev:

       Add a program to the list of programs to be executed after
       processing all the rules for a specific event, depending on

           Execute an external program specified as the assigned
           value. If no absolute path is given, the program is
           expected to live in /lib/udev; otherwise, the absolute
           path must be specified.

You can also check what udev logs:

Aug 11 21:57:43 ja-VirtualBox systemd-udevd[2998]: failed to execute '/lib/udev/./scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh' './scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh': No such file or directory

Or non-systemd systems:

[769712.027218] udevd[13015]: failed to execute '/lib/udev/./scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh' './scripts/icleverkeybindings.sh': No such file or directory

That being said, you have to either pass an absolute path to icleverkeybindings.sh in your udev rule, something like this:

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="bluetooth", RUN+="/path/to/icleverkeybindings.sh"

or put icleverkeybindings.sh in /lib/udev and just use a filename in udev rule:

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="bluetooth", RUN+="icleverkeybindings.sh"

In both cases you need to make sure that icleverkeybindings.sh has an executable bit is set because otherwise:

Aug 11 22:07:49 ja-VirtualBox systemd-udevd[3345]: failed to execute '/lib/udev/icleverkeybindings.sh' 'icleverkeybindings.sh': Permission denied
Aug 11 22:07:49 ja-VirtualBox systemd-udevd[3325]: Process 'icleverkeybindings.sh' failed with exit code 2.
| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks for your answer. I did set the executable bit for the script, and I did put the absolute path. How did you check the udev log? – Joe Aug 11 '19 at 20:37
  • It depends on your system configuration, it might be in /var/log/syslog or in dmesg. – Arkadiusz Drabczyk Aug 11 '19 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.