In theory, switching from the ondemand governor to conservative should save battery life on laptops.

However, I don't think I've ever seen any tests done to verify this or show how significant a saving can be made.

Can anyone find a source where such tests have been done?

  • You could conduct this test yourself, but I believe the most power cost come from the Monitor.
    – daisy
    Commented Oct 4, 2012 at 23:34
  • I suspect the same but I haven't seen actual figures before. A lot of sites recommend altering the CPU governor to get more laptop battery life, and my theory is that this is not gonna save you anything significant :)
    – trr
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 0:46

1 Answer 1


Here are some tests done by the folks @ IBM:

cpufreq tuning results

They're not specifically testing battery life but should give you an idea about ondemand - versus - conservative power consumption.

  • Thanks for that interesting link. It looks like ondemand and conservative are identical at 0% load and from 50% load to 100% load, while loads from 1% to 49% will benefit by up to ~30 Watts out of an insane ~380 Watts. This is one seriously power-hungry system with something like 10 times the power usage of a modern laptop.
    – trr
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 0:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .