I am learning the wildcards recursive globbing and tried

$ ls **/* | wc -l
$ ls */** | wc -l

They output identical results.

Is there any distinction between **/* and */**?

1 Answer 1


*/** will only match directories (and their subdirectories & files); it will not match files (non-directories) in the current directory, because the */ portion of it requires a directory prefix before beginning the ** globstar expansion. As for **/*, the trailing /* is extraneous, since the ** will, by itself, expand to every file and directory under the current directory (subject to the dotglob option). Since every directory has been expanded by that point, the trailing /* does not match anything.

Be careful using ls to test, since it will "helpfully" read into any directories that you might pass it; consider instead something like:

printf "%s\n" */**
printf "%s\n" **/*

Also note that piping to wc -l could mislead you for actual counts; consider:

$ touch a $'b\nc'
$ ls -1
$ ls | wc -l
3     ## WRONG!
  • Also beware that in zsh (the original implementation of recursive globbing), ** alone is not special (it's the same as *), only **/ is (short for (*/)#). The API is different again in fish. See The result of ls * , ls ** and ls *** for details. Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 16:19
  • 1
    The ls **/* | wc -l issues can be worked around by using ls -qd -- **/* | wc -l Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 16:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .