I would like to install Debian 5 on an older PC, because I expect that the kernel of Debian 5 would work better on this computer.

I downloaded the netinstall ISO from debian.org and I tried to install it on a Virtualbox machine. I got this error: Bad mirror. I changed the mirror to archive.debian.org as a hostname, then /debian/ and the problem got resolved.

My problem right now is that the installation stucks on Please wait..., on the screen of Select and install (exactly after choosing what to install - only Standard System - at 13%).

I don't get any errors. I don't know also how to check logs or something else if there exists some.

When I Press CTRL+ALT+F4, I see the following on the screen:

> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: You should only proceed with the installation if you re certain that
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: this is what you want to do.
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target:
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: ispell ibritish wamerican mlocate exim4-config libnfsidmapZ bind9-host
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: mime-support libidn11 telnet lsof bash-completion dsutils
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: exim4-daemon-light perl libcap2 mutt reportbug libds58 bc m4 doc-debian
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: dc at libeuent1 ncurses-term libpcre3 doc-linux-texwhois libsqlite3-0
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: python2.5 python-minimal libisccc50 procmail time 1ibrpcsecgss3
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: liblwres50 python ftp pciutils dictionaries-commonpython-central w3m
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: openbsd-inetd libbind9-50 libxle libgme debian-fafile ucf
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: perl-modules python2.5-minimal libldap-2.4-2 libiscfg50 libdb4.5
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: bsd-mailx exim4 libgc1c2 exim4-base patch libisc50 libgssgluel iamerican
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: portmap nfs-common less libmagicl texinfo liblockfile1
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target:
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: Do you want to ignore this warning and proceed anyway
> sep 14 15:36:00 in-target: To continue, enter "Yes": to abort, enter "No":

What is this warning message about? What can I do?

Important to note that I had tried to install Debian 9 on a VirtualBox and it worked. I tried to install Debian 6 and had the same problem.

  • 6
    Why Debian 5? I would select the latest 32-bit release of FreeBSD. – Rui F Ribeiro Sep 14 at 15:16
  • @RuiFRibeiro - Thank you! But why FreeBSD? Should it work well on older computers? – MM PP Sep 14 at 15:18
  • I am using the latest FreeBSD in my Asus 2008 Atom clamshell netbook – Rui F Ribeiro Sep 14 at 15:20
  • 3
  • 1
    @Alpha3031 I don't think it is really simple to install Debian 5 Kernel in Debian 9. I think there should be problems with systemd as Debian 5 has Kernel v2.6.26. – NETCreator Hosting - WebDesign Sep 15 at 10:21
up vote 26 down vote accepted

I would like to install Debian 5 on an older PC, because Debian 5's kernel should work well on this computer.

Umm... no!

That is in fact a Really Bad Idea. There are multiple GNU/Linux distributions available that will run on - and are in fact made for - older 32bit PC's (AntiX, Bodhi etc).

You should never run operating systems that have reach end of life, and as such do not recieve security updates in a timely order.

And I fail to see why an older kernel should work better than a new one, if it is non PAE you are looking for, there are alternatives (see above).

  • 1
    Thank you for this answer! I observed that latest Debian is working slowly on my laptop. The CPU is always 100%, even if doing nothing. The screen resolution is recognized as 800*600 (I can't do anything with that). In Windows this laptop is working well. I installed some time ago an older Ubuntu and it worked better (but not best). Now I realized that the Kernel should be the cause and I want to install Debian, Trinity DE, but with older Kernel. I need Debian. So I though I should install an older Debian. Now I am confused as I really want Debian, not other Distro. Thank you! – MM PP Sep 14 at 17:53
  • 1
    I have also an old computer. It has a Pentium IV, 3Ghz. It seems it is working slow with Debian. CPU is almost of the time 100% (the CPU is always 100%, while browsing the web - one tab, simple websites), even with light DE or browser. CentOS 6 seems to work very well on it, as I used it as a webserver too, and tested CentOS. CentOS 6 has an old Kernel. But I need Debian, now. I don't know what to do. – MM PP Sep 14 at 18:01
  • I second AntiX, using it in new hardware. – Rui F Ribeiro Sep 14 at 18:48
  • @MMPP I suggest that you mark this answer as accepted. – Mike Waters Sep 15 at 16:25

Please use the archive mirror provided by debian: http://archive.debian.org/debian/

The alternative is to use ISO DVDs, which can be found on their mirror so you do not need network during installation:

https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/5.0.10/amd64/iso-dvd/

  • Thank you, Vince! But as I said, I configured it to archive.debian.org/debian/. I don't get "Bad mirror", but the installation stucks on "Please wait...", when it starts "Select and install software" – MM PP Sep 14 at 15:34
  • Pressed CTRL+ALT+F4. I get this: imgur.com/a/NtC8kBD What is the warning? – MM PP Sep 14 at 15:41
  • The packages on archive.debian.org are of little use since the key's expired for Debian 5 (and 6). You'll need an ISO to get something that works, and without a full set, it's pointless. – Thomas Dickey Sep 14 at 16:02
  • @ThomasDickey: Set your clock back to install. Once installed there's a way to order it to ignore the fact the key is expired. – Joshua Sep 14 at 18:18
  • 1
    Thank you, @Joshua. But how to get Debian installed? I am using netinstall as there is no minimal iso. – MM PP Sep 14 at 18:25

It seems your first problem from the questions and comments is using the netinstall image. It probably won't work nowadays.

For installing, the best course of action is using the full DVDs.

As for using something modern Debian based that supports 32 bits, you can use AntiX, as others recommended. However, it will be slower, as graphical environments nowadays expect more powerful machines.

I usually run the latest FreeBSD 32-bits on legacy hardware, have regular updates and much more satisfied with the resulting performance.

Using old distros is a Windows reflex to solve similar problems.

In fact, the growth of the binaries and the memory/CPU needs have no real reason; Windows is developed on this way, Linux software mostly aren't. In Linux, older software is still available and doesn't allocate significantly more RAM as in the old distro. In exchange, we have better tuned RAM optimization algorithms.

I think the best option is to use a recent distro, but using with older (lesser RAM needed) software. Particularly in the case of the Debian, you can simply drop the gnome/kde/any monstrous windowing subsystems and use simply icewm.1

Furthermore, you can also use the deborphan command to clean up the not very needed packages from your system, particularly if they start daemons what you don't need.

1If you are using it, you can give a try to ratpoison. Keyboard-only VM without window decorations, has only full-screen windows and it is controlled like screen. Its memory need is practically non-existent and lightning fast.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.