6

I have 2 small functions to abbreviate set -x / set +x, namely:

sx () {
    export PS4='+ [${BASH_SOURCE##*/}:${LINENO}]'
    set -x
}

and

sz () {
    set +x
    export PS4=
}

These 2 functions are in a file functons.sh which is sourced from ~/.bashrc, and visible online here.

Immediately after logging in to a new bash session, I try to find out where the sz() function is like this:

$ shopt -s extdebug; declare -F sz; shopt -u extdebug
sz 25 /Users/jab/src/git/hub/jab/src/bash/keyboard/z.sh

This shows that bash thinks the sz() function is declared in z.sh, but at that line there is a different function, zzz(), online here.

The result for the sx() function (and all my myriad other functions) is correct

$ shopt -s extdebug; declare -F sx; shopt -u extdebug
sx 428 /Users/jab/src/git/hub/jab3/src/bash/functons.sh

Why does the declare -F command get the wrong result for the sz function?

10

You also have an alias in functons.shwith the same name as a function in your other file.

In functons.sh:

alias zzz=sz

In z.sh:

zzz () {
    df -h
}

This confuses bash.

Example:

$ cat f1
foo () { echo hello; }
alias xfoo=foo

$ cat f2
xfoo () { echo beep; }

$ source f1
$ source f2
$ shopt -s extdebug
$ declare -F foo
foo 1 f2

Without the xfoo alias in f1:

$ source f1
$ source f2
$ shopt -s extdebug
$ declare -F foo
foo 1 f1

The bash manual also includes the text

Aliases are confusing in some uses.

under the "BUGS" heading.

  • That's the fix! Thanks for helping me see what was staring me in the face :-) – jalanb May 30 '18 at 13:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.