So I was going to back up my home folder by copying it to an external drive as follows:

sudo cp -r /home/my_home /media/backup/my_home

With the result that all folders on the external drives are now owned by root:root. How can I have cp keep the ownership and permissions from the original?

  • 31
    Yes, it would, be I'm glad he asked because google is still faster than 'man' :-). – Stijn Geukens Aug 4 '14 at 14:54
  • 4
    I'm glad he asked too – Ole Apr 7 '16 at 16:28
  • 8
    @StijnGeukens It's not even that google is faster, it's that even man to me is cryptic. In this case, man at -r says same as --preserve=mode,ownership,timestamps. How was I supposed to know that means keep the original permissions!? – Kolob Canyon Nov 15 '16 at 0:33
  • 2
    @KolobCanyon you mean at -p – storm Jul 11 '19 at 8:06
  • In the context of files and directories, mode means permissions. As in chmod; it means change mode. Nomenclature! Gotta love it. – gillytech May 10 '20 at 23:09

10 Answers 10

sudo cp -rp /home/my_home /media/backup/my_home

From cp manpage:

 -p     same as --preserve=mode,ownership,timestamps

          preserve the specified attributes (default: mode,ownership,timestamps),
          if possible additional attributes: context, links, xattr, all
  • 173
    Much better to use cp -a. This also includes the -recursive flag, but it does more than that—it preserves everything about the file; SELinux attributes, links, xattr, everything. It's "archive mode." There are better tools for making a backup, but if you're using cp for a backup, don't use anything other than cp -a. – Wildcard Oct 14 '15 at 3:54
  • 31
    It works, but Patience is Good here. The command will only set everything right when it finishes: While it's still copying a directory, and you're running cp as root, the directory will be owned by root. It will only set it to the right permissions when it finishes with this directory. – Paul Nov 18 '15 at 17:01
  • 5
    cp -a doesn't work on some systems: e.g. OS X, where (in some versions at least) one needed to use cp -pR. On my current OS X system though (10.10.15), cp -a seems to be honored. – dubiousjim Sep 30 '17 at 16:30
  • 1
    If I use cp -a to copy a folder structure then use diff <(getfacl -R folder1) <(getfacl -R folder2) i sill seem to get different access control lists :( – philx_x May 29 '19 at 18:20
  • 1
    @EugeneKaurov -r is recursive. Without it you can't copy directories. – Henno Sep 12 '19 at 6:08

You can also use rsync.

sudo rsync -a /home/my_home/ /media/backup/my_home/

From the rsync manpage:

 -a, --archive
              This  is  equivalent  to  -rlptgoD.  It  is a quick way of saying you want
              recursion and want to preserve almost everything (with -H being a  notable
              omission).    The   only  exception  to  the  above  equivalence  is  when
              --files-from is specified, in which case -r is not implied.

              Note that -a does not preserve hardlinks, because finding  multiply-linked
              files is expensive.  You must separately specify -H.

See this question for a comparison between cp and rsync: https://stackoverflow.com/q/6339287/406686

Note the trailing slashes (see manpage for details).

  • 4
    +1, cp -p is nice, but I like rsync's output so much more in general that I've aliased pcp to time rsync --progress -ah. Stands for "progress copy" in my mind. And both accept -r, so it works well for general terminal usage - but unfortunately, not in combination with sudo as shown in this question/answer. – Izkata Jul 20 '12 at 17:59
  • 20
    NB: rsync -a, does not preserve extended attributes (-X) and no ACLs (-A) - the short description says archive mode; equals -rlptgoD (no -H,-A,-X). E.g. SELinux contexts will not be preserverd without -X. For many use cases this is fine, but if you make a backup of your system partition, missing -X might break quite a lot. As far as I know, cp -a really preserves all file attributes. – Perseids Sep 23 '14 at 6:44
  • 3
    Just tested this, while sudo cp -a preserves ownership and groups, sudo rsync -a changes them into root. So, @Perseids is correct. – John Hamilton Mar 16 '18 at 11:59
  • 3
    @JohnHamilton Under Mint, this works perfectly... it only changes ownership and groups later on (I can't tell when). I've just copied my whole /home folder with rsync -aX /home /mnt/sdd/ and it worked like a charm. – Olivier Pons Oct 18 '18 at 7:04
  • 1
    @JohnHamilton that's not what Perseides said at all. – user643011 Aug 24 '19 at 15:30
cp -a

Where -a is short for --archive — basically it copies a directory exactly as it is; the files retain all their attributes, and symlinks are not dereferenced (-d).

From man cp:

   -a, --archive
          same as -dR --preserve=all
  • 1
    Which doesn’t preserve ᴀᴄʟs. – user2284570 May 17 '20 at 13:19

I use cp -pdRx which will -p preserve mode, ownership & timestamps, -d preserve links (so you get symlinks instead the file contents copied), -R do it recursively and -x stay on one file system (only really useful if you're copying / or something with an active mount point).

PS: -R instead of -r is just habit from using ls -lR.

  • 3
    cp -ax is a slightly shorter version of the same thing. This worked great - thank you! – EM0 Mar 25 '15 at 12:27
  • Actually there is a difference between -r and -R. Check the man page (even the particular part too long to be quoted here). – geckon Jul 8 '15 at 13:23
  • 5
    I don't think there is (although there may once have been and may still be on some versions of Unix). See man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/cp.1.html It simply says -R, -r, --recursive copy directories recursively. – StarNamer Jul 8 '15 at 16:09

cp has an option to preserve file ownership. From the manual page of cp:

-p    Cause cp to preserve the following attributes of each source file in the copy: modification
      time, access time, file flags, file mode, user ID, and group ID, as allowed by permissions.
      Access Control Lists (ACLs) and Extended Attributes (EAs), including resource forks, will also
      be preserved.

You can do something like this:

tar cf - my_home | (cd /media/backup; sudo tar xf - )

tar keeps permissions, ownership and directory structure intact, but converts everything into a stream of bytes. You run a "subshell" (the parenthesized commands) that change directory, and then get tar to reverse the conversion. A steam of bytes becomes directories and files with correct ownership and permissions.

  • Is there a difference between using tar and using cp -rp as other answers suggest? – lucidbrot Apr 1 '20 at 15:18
  • 1
    @lucidbrot - I would think tar and cp -rp would differ only in corner cases - how they handle symbolic links or other special files, handling extended attributes of some filesystems, or dealing with sparse files. – Bruce Ediger Apr 2 '20 at 13:40

The answer is simple: cp has a -p option that preserves permissions (here's a fish).

But as Wojtek says in his comment, man cp (reading the fine manual) would be a good starting point (want to learn how to fish?).


you can use preserve=all, then your copy will keep all attributes like owner, group and timestamp of your files. So, do your backup safely with the following command.

cp -r --preserve=all /home/my_home /media/backup/my_home

The answer is

cp -rp /source/ /dest
  • 1
    This answer seems to be exactly like the accepted answer (save the for sudo call, which however the OP seemes to be necessary ...) – AdminBee Jun 2 '20 at 9:46
  • 1
    Also, you cannot preserve ownerships while copying unless you are root. Otherwise on systems with a per-user disk quota, it would allow an user to fill up other users' disk quota by making copies of their files, as a form of a local denial-of-service attack. – telcoM Jun 3 '20 at 6:41

well ive using Linux Zorin and my issue was trying to copy over my home folder to an external drive while my computer is booted on a iso ( bootable usb drive ) as ive messed up my sdd and it now doest bootup properly so im doing a new install, this time i hope to install windows 7 then zorin OZ successfully or just Zorin OS, im not sure if i should dual boot or do linux with virtual machine.

what i did :

install caja ( through command line or software store )

run caja as root ( i used command line and run it as ROOT )

copy and paste my files i wanted, skipped the stuff that didnt want to copy and hopefully the ones i dont care about )


for me 20gb of my home folder is taking forever, the few minutes it has been feels like an internity right now.

Hope this helps anyone even with all my rambling here.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.