1

I am trying to install multiple versions of python on my machine using the deadsnakes ppa on debian (not ubuntu):

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/fkrull/deadsnakes/ubuntu xenial main

However, I'm finding problems with package dependencies. Older versions of python (e.g. python3.4) depend upon udeb packages, but apt can't find these.

The strange things is that I can find these packages on the debian package lists: (e.g. https://packages.debian.org/buster/zlib1g-udeb). And if one follows the links through then the udeb packages seem live in main like other packages http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g-udeb_1.2.8.dfsg-5_amd64.udeb . But apt just isn't finding these.

One finds the ominous warning:

Warning: This package is intended for the use in building debian-installer images only. Do not install it on a normal Debian system.

But I would prefer not to build python from source so am wiling to take the risk of installing these packages on my machine.

How can I get apt to find these udeb packages?

Links

2

As the “ominous” warning says, micro-debs (udebs) are only intended for use in the Debian installer (they contain simplified packages which are used to build the installation environment). They mustn’t be installed on a normal system: they aren’t intended to be uninstalled or upgraded, which makes them unsuitable for use in an installed system (the installer runs a RAM-based system, so they’re fine there). udebs are typically either specific to the installation process, or have non-udeb equivalents which should be used instead (see for example libevdev2 and libevdev2-udeb).

No non-udeb package should have a dependency on a udeb, and indeed as far as I can tell none do (in Debian and Ubuntu).

  • "They mustn’t be installed on a normal system." citation needed :P . What goes wrong if one installs them? – Att Righ Dec 11 '17 at 16:14
  • 1
    See the Debian Installer internals guide. If you install a udeb, there are no guarantees you’ll be able to uninstall it or upgrade it. udebs are typically either specific to the installation process, or have non-udeb equivalents which should be used instead (see for example libevdev2 and libevdev2-udeb). – Stephen Kitt Dec 11 '17 at 16:18
  • Thanks for the details. Umm I was trying to track down the dependency chain. Basically I got into a state where apt-get install was refusing to install stuff due to missing -udeb packages. – Att Righ Dec 11 '17 at 16:30
  • "Another important difference is that udebs are not really meant to be uninstalled or upgraded." (your source) That seems kind of compelling. – Att Righ Dec 11 '17 at 16:34
  • 1
    Right, that would explain it — I was looking for a -udeb dependency in the “main” packages and coming up empty-handed. – Stephen Kitt Dec 11 '17 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.