How are chown and chmod command different in the given operation?

Question

If I change the ownership of the contents of a file and further set permissions to the content of the file, how exactly are both the operations different?

For example, if I change the ownership of the files in a directory (public_html) to only owner and group.

chown robo:wwwrobo /home/souvik/public_html

And then if I change the file permissions of the contents inside public_html such that

chmod 755 /home/souvik/public_html

In the first command, for the 'others' clearly I haven't given any ownership to the files and in the second command I am giving read and execute permission to others (chmod 755). So what will exactly happen now? If I haven't given any ownership to 'others', what's the point of giving file permission of 5 to 'others'? They don't own the file anyway.

I am asking this because I saw these two set of commands being used one after the other in an example.

Answer 1

You're mixing two different things.

• chown - changes ownership of files/dirs. Ie. owner of the file/dir changes to the specified one, but it doesn't modify permissions.

Let's explain your command:

chown robo:wwwrobo /home/souvik/public_html

With this command you said that new owner of the dir /home/souvik/public_html is now user 'robo' and new group is 'wwwrobo'. You haven't modified permissions!

• chmod - modifies permissions of the file/dir, doesn't change ownership!

Let's explain your command:

chmod 755 /home/souvik/public_html

The permissions of directory /home/souvik/public_html changed to rwx for owner (robo), r-x for group (wwwrobo) and r-x for others (all other users on the system).

rwx means full access (read/write/enter in directory context; read/write/execute in file context) r-x means that the user/group is only allowed to read/enter(execute) the file/dir, but can't write there

See full description:

https://www.linux.com/learn/understanding-linux-file-permissions