1

I would like to refresh the UIDs and postpone the expiration date but I get.

gpg --edit-key n.dwek@hotmail.com 
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.15; Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Secret key is available.

pub  rsa4096/0x03FFE7DE7AEFDD3B
     created: 2014-09-21  expires: 2017-09-20  usage: SC  
     trust: ultimate      validity: ultimate
ssb  rsa4096/0x612502E7B5475FF9
     created: 2014-09-21  expires: 2017-09-20  usage: E   
ssb  rsa4096/0x6777F12E17534B8E
     created: 2014-09-21  expires: 2017-09-20  usage: S   
[ultimate] (1). Nathan DWEK <dwek95@hotmail.com>
[ultimate] (2)  Nathan DWEK <n.dwek@hotmail.com>

gpg> expire
Changing expiration time for the primary key.
gpg: WARNING: no user ID has been marked as primary.  This command may
              cause a different user ID to become the assumed primary.
Please specify how long the key should be valid.
         0 = key does not expire
      <n>  = key expires in n days
      <n>w = key expires in n weeks
      <n>m = key expires in n months
      <n>y = key expires in n years
Key is valid for? (0) 2y
Key expires at jeu 19 sep 2019 12:19:31 CEST
Is this correct? (y/N) y
gpg: signing failed: No secret key
gpg: make_keysig_packet failed: No secret key

However:

gpg --list-secret-keys 
/home/nathdwek/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
---------------------------------
sec#  rsa4096/0x03FFE7DE7AEFDD3B 2014-09-21 [SC] [expires: 2017-09-20]
      Key fingerprint = 1A12 B5ED F67A 947C B616  6FCC 03FF E7DE 7AEF DD3B
uid                   [ultimate] Nathan DWEK <dwek95@hotmail.com>
uid                   [ultimate] Nathan DWEK <n.dwek@hotmail.com>
ssb   rsa4096/0x612502E7B5475FF9 2014-09-21 [E] [expires: 2017-09-20]
ssb   rsa4096/0x6777F12E17534B8E 2014-09-21 [S] [expires: 2017-09-20]

Signing and using pass, a gpg-based password manager has been working perfectly for a long time. I am on Ubuntu 17.04 with cinnamon.

  • Try adding --default-key 0x03FFE7DE7AEFDD3B. – Satō Katsura Sep 19 '17 at 10:31
1

I was using an offline master key and used subkeys for signing and decryption. This was displayed by the # in front of my master key.

This is why the only operations I could not perform were key signing operations.

  • 1
    With this knowledge, were you able to come up with an invocation that lets you sign keys? What was it? – kojiro Feb 20 '18 at 19:26
  • @kojiro: No it is not possible to do key signing operations without the master key. Fortunately once I realized I had an offline master key, I also remembered where it was stashed. – nathdwek Feb 26 '18 at 8:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.