3

Compare the following:

mount -t proc none ./my_chroot/proc

and:

chroot ./mychroot mount -t proc none /proc
  • 1
    There's also mount -B (bind) option, commonly used to bind /dev and /proc into chroot jail. – alex Nov 11 '10 at 12:24
1

There are no differences with respect to the underlying kernel state.

There is a minor difference with respect to the operation of the mount command: it keeps track of its actions in /etc/mtab, so running mount under chroot will update a different mtab file.

You could also use mount --bind /proc ./my_chroot/proc. As far as I know, there is no practical difference between that and mount -t proc none ./mychroot/proc: you can mount the proc filesystem as many times as you like, and mount options are ignored. mount --bind will prevent you from unmounting the filesystem on /proc outside the chroot, but that should never happen anyway.

As an aside, I would recommend mount -t proc proc …/proc because seeing proc in the device field in a mtab or in /proc/mounts is clearer than seeing none.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.