I know that, given l="a b c"
,
echo $l | xargs ls
yields
ls a b c
Which construct yields
mycommand -f a -f b -f c
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityOne way to do it:
echo "a b c" | xargs printf -- '-f %s\n' | xargs mycommand
This assumes a
, b
, and c
don't contain blanks, newlines, quotes or backslashes. :)
With GNU findutil
you can handle the general case, but it's slightly more complicated:
echo -n "a|b|c" | tr \| \\0 | xargs -0 printf -- '-f\0%s\0' | xargs -0 mycommand
You can replace the |
separator with some other character, that doesn't appear in a
, b
, or c
.
Edit: As @MichaelMol notes, with a very long list of arguments there is a risk of overflowing the maximum length of arguments that can be passed to mycommand
. When that happens, the last xargs
will split the list and run another copy of mycommand
, and there is a risk of it leaving an unterminated -f
. If you worry about that situation you could replace the last xargs -0
above by something like this:
... | xargs -x -0 mycommand
This won't solve the problem, but it would abort running mycommand
when the list of arguments gets too long.
ARG_MAX
and having a -f
separated from its paired parameter.
May 16, 2017 at 14:14
mycommand
. You could always add -x
to the last xargs
.
May 16, 2017 at 14:20
xargs
at all, and just use find
if it can be used. This solution is dangerous; you should at least warn of the failure case in your answer.
May 16, 2017 at 14:22
find
would be a better general solution, particularly when the initial arguments aren't filenames. :)
May 16, 2017 at 14:29
-f
, and with an example tool ls
used for illustration, @not-a-user is dealing with filenames. And given find
offers the -exec
argument, which allows you to construct a command-line, it's fine. (So long as mycommand
is permitted to execute more than once. If it's not, then we have another problem with the use of xargs
here...)
May 16, 2017 at 14:37
A better way to address it (IMO) would be:
in zsh
:
l=(a b c)
mycommand -f$^l
or using array zipping so the argument be not attached to the option:
l=(a b c) o=(-f)
mycommand "${o:^^l}"
That way, it still works if the l
array contains empty elements or elements containing spaces or any other problematic character for xargs
. Example:
$ l=(a '' '"' 'x y' c) o=(-f)
$ printf '<%s>\n' "${o:^^l}"
<-f>
<a>
<-f>
<>
<-f>
<">
<-f>
<x y>
<-f>
<c>
in rc
:
l=(a b c)
mycommand -f$l
in fish
:
set l a b c
mycommand -f$l
(AFAIK, rc
and fish
have no array zipping)
With old-style Bourne-like shells like bash
, you could always do (still allowing any character in the elements of the $@
array):
set -- a b c
for i do set -- "$@" -f "$i"; shift; done
mycommand "$@"
for i; do args+=('-f' "$i");done;
mycommand "${args[@]}"
. IDK if this is faster, but appending 2 elements to an array seems like it should be O(n), while your set
loop probably copies and re-parses the accumulated arg list every time (O(n^2)).
May 16, 2017 at 17:05
The simplest way to prefix arguments is via printf
in conjunction with command substitution:
l="a b c"
mycommand $(printf ' -f %s' $l)
Alternatively, the command substitution $()
can be rewritten by piping to xargs
:
printf ' -f %s' $l | xargs mycommand
The command substitution allows to control location of the dynamic arguments in the argument list. For instance, you can prepend, append, or even place the arguments anywhere in between any other fixed arguments to be passed to mycommand
.
The xargs
approach works best to append arguments to the end, but it requires a more obscure syntax to handle different placement of dynamic arguments among fixed ones.
Here's my real-world example. It's a quick'n'dirty hack but it works.
docker-compose exec postfix mailq | egrep '^[A-Z0-9]{8}' | cut -f 1 -d " " | \
xargs printf -- '-d %s\n' | \
xargs -n4 -d '\n' echo "docker-compose exec -- postfix postsuper"
The above will generate this kind of output:
docker-compose exec -- postfix postsuper -d 794B95AB886 -d 7D2375AA207
docker-compose exec -- postfix postsuper -d 0A6AE5AA244 -d 048D85AA231
...
Prepend -f
:
echo 'a b c' | xargs -n 1 echo -e -f | xargs mycommand
The -e argument is there to avoid -f being interpreted as another argument
If you instead want an output like this one (a, b, and c are each between an -f and a -g):
mycommand -f a -g -f b -g -f c -g
Then the command would be this one:
echo 'a b c' | tr ' ' '\n' | xargs -I @ echo -e -f @ -g | xargs mycommand
echo
implementations output -e<newline>
upon echo -e
. I don't know of any that accepts -f
as an option though. See also Why is printf better than echo?
Mar 30 at 22:40