su, you become another user — root by default, but potentially another user. If you say
su -, your environment gets replaced with that user's login environment as well, so that what you see is indistinguishable from logging in as that user. There is no way the system can tell what you do while
su'd to another user from actions by that user when they log in.
Things are very different with
Commands you run through
sudo execute as the target user — root by default, but changeable with
-u — but it logs the commands you run through it, tagging them with your username so blame can be assigned afterward. :)
sudo is very flexible. You can limit the commands a given user or group of users are allowed to run, for example. With
su, it's all or nothing.
This feature is typically used to define roles. For instance, you could define a "backups" group allowed to run
tar, each of which needs root access to properly back up the system disk.
I mention this here because it means you can give someone
sudo privileges without giving them
sudo -s or
sudo bash abilities. They have only the permissions they need to do their job, whereas with
su they have run of the entire system. You have to be careful with this, though: if you give someone the ability to say
sudo vi, for example, they can shell out of
vi and have effectively the same power as with
Because it takes the sudoer's password instead of the root password,
sudo isolates permission between multiple sudoers.
This solves an administrative problem with
su, which is that when the root password changes, all those who had to know it to use
su had to be told.
sudo allows the sudoers' passwords to change independently. In fact, it is common to password-lock the root user's account on a system with
sudo to force all sysadmin tasks to be done via
sudo. In a large organization with many trusted sudoers, this means when one of the sysadmins leaves, you don't have to change the root password and distribute it to those admins who remain.
The main differences between
sudo bash and
sudo -s are:
-s is shorter than
You can say
sudo -s some-command to run
some-command under your default shell, but with superuser privileges. It's basically shorthand for
sudo $SHELL -c some-command.
You can instead pass the commands to the shell's standard input, like
sudo -s < my-shell-script. You could use this with a heredoc to send several commands to a single
sudo call, avoiding the need to type
Even without these extra command arguments,
sudo -s still differs from
sudo bash in that it might run a different shell than
bash, since it looks first in the
SHELL environment variable, and then if that is unset, at your user's login shell setting, typically in
The shell run by
sudo -s inherits your current user environment. If what you actually want is a clean environment, like you get just after login, what you want instead is
sudo -i, a relatively recent addition to
sudo. Roughly speaking,
sudo -i is to
sudo -s as
su - is to
su: it resets all but a few key environment variables and sends you back to your user's home directory. If you don't also give it commands to run under that shell via standard input or
sudo -i some-command, it will run that shell as an interactive login shell, so your user's shell startup scripts (e.g.
.bash_profile) get run again.
All of this makes
sudo -i considerably more secure than
sudo -s. Why? Because if someone can modify your environment before
sudo -s, they could cause unintended commands to be executed. The most obvious case is modifying
SHELL, but it can also happen less directly, such as via
PAGER if you say
man foo while under
You might say, "If they can modify
PAGER, they can modify
PATH, and then they can just substitute an evil
sudo program," but someone sufficiently paranoid can say
/usr/bin/sudo /bin/bash to avoid that trap. You're probably not so paranoid that you also avoid the traps in all the other susceptible environment variables, though. Did you also remember to check
EDITOR, for example, before running any VCS command? Thus
sudo -i also changes your working directory to your user's home directory, you might still want to use
sudo -s for those situations where you know you want to remain in the same directory you were
cd'd into when you ran
sudo. It's still safer to
sudo -i and
cd back to where you were, though.
Another variant of all this that you sometimes see is
sudo su, which is approximately equivalent to
sudo -s. Likewise,
sudo su - is functionally quite close to
sudo -i. Since
su are competing commands, it's a little odd to pair them like this, so I recommend that you use the
sudo flags instead.