Was not sure if this should go here or on TeX Stackexchange. Feel free to move if I made mistake. My setup is: GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-5-686, CrunchBang Linux statler. I have installed xetex through apt-get (texlive-xetex). Problem is that whenever I try to compile a .tex file which LaTeX will compile without problems, I get the following from xetex:

This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied)

I have installed xelatex, my latex version is

me@box:~$ latex --version pdfTeX 3.1415926-1.40.10-2.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) kpathsea version 5.0.0

Version of xelatex is

asha@andromeda:~$ xelatex --version XeTeX 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) kpathsea version 5.0.0

Searching, this seems to be related to a recent update to zlib, version zlib-1.2.6. Source. Other posts reveal that other programs have been affected as well, but I have not been able to find a description of a solution I can use. There was one example where someone reported on seuccessfully linking to the older version of zlib when building the tool in question from sources. This might be a bit above my Linux skills for now.

What can I do with my present distro and setup to have xetex working ?

  • There's a bug report in that, apparently it has been fixed in unstable (according to this, also in testing), no idea what Crunchbang uses... so maybe your problem will fix itself soon. – sr_ Mar 18 '12 at 10:30
  • Thank you. Updating texlive-binaries and texlive-xetex to the versions mentioned in your links makes it work for me. MAke your comment a reply and I will mark it as the answer. – Michael Ras Mar 18 '12 at 12:12

There's a bug report on this issue in Debian's bug tracking system, mentioning that Debian's unstable repositories already have fixed packages (and the package databases shows that they already hit the Debian/testing repos). Since Crunchbang 10 "Statler" is based on Debian/stable, these fixed packages could take some time to be available there; you can however mix-and-match if you're a little careful (see e.g. this question).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.