I need to be able to alphabetically sort the output of find before piping it to a command. Entering | sort | between didn't work, so what could I do?

find folder1 folder2 -name "*.txt" -print0 | xargs -0 myCommand

6 Answers 6


Use find as usual and delimit your lines with NUL. GNU sort can handle these with the -z switch:

find . -print0 | sort -z | xargs -r0 yourcommand
  • 1
    It does not seem to work with find . -name '*.dat' -type f -printf '%f\n' | sort -z | xargs -r0 > output.txt. Is my line wrong due to the printf?
    – bomben
    Nov 24, 2020 at 17:47
  • @Ben you're not using -print0 and are introducing newlines instead of NULLs.
    – ychaouche
    May 24, 2021 at 13:29
  • or together with formating the output find . -printf "%y %p \n\0" | sort -z
    – BMWW
    Jul 9, 2021 at 15:38

Some versions of sort have a -z option, which allows for null-terminated records.

find folder1 folder2 -name "*.txt" -print0 | sort -z | xargs -r0 myCommand

Additionally, you could also write a high-level script to do it:

find folder1 folder2 -name "*.txt" -print0 | python -c 'import sys; sys.stdout.write("\0".join(sorted(sys.stdin.read().split("\0"))))' | xargs -r0 myCommand

Add the -r option to xargs to make sure that myCommand is called with an argument.

  • Good one (two?)... Interestingly, though, the two methods handle . differently... With sort it winds up at the end of the list... with python it sorts to the top. (maybe python sorts with LC_COLLATE=C)
    – Peter.O
    Mar 16, 2012 at 14:45
  • There is also the -t \0 option for sort (which is a -z synonym)
    – Javier
    Aug 10, 2015 at 18:44
  • 1
    The problem with all these |sort solutions is that you cannot use -exec any longer. OK, although it is possible to rewrite your statement given to -exec so that it works with xargs, the question is, what about "mini-scripts"? (sh -c ...) I wouldn't call that trivial to transform a 'sh -c' mini-script with multiple commands so that it can work with xargs (if possible at all, that is) Nov 20, 2015 at 19:57
  • @syntaxerror: What problem do you have using sh -c with xargs? printf %s\\n a b c d e | xargs -n3 sh -c 'printf %s, "$@"; printf \\n' x
    – Roger Pate
    Aug 24, 2016 at 18:11
  • -t \0 is not the same as -z. -t is for field separator, not for line delimiter.
    – graywolf
    Jan 22, 2020 at 15:05

I think you need the -n flag for sort#

According to man sort:

-n, --numeric-sort
    compare according to string numerical value


The print0 may have something to do with this, I just tested this. Take the print0 out, you can null terminate the string in sort using the -z flag

  • Well, that print0 appears to be space-separating the filenames which is what I need to pass to my command, unfortunately
    – Industrial
    Mar 16, 2012 at 10:46

If you have GNU Parallel http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ installed you can do this:

find folder1 folder2 -name "*.txt" -print | 
  sort |
  parallel myCommand

You can install GNU Parallel simply by:

wget http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parallel.git/plain/src/parallel
chmod 755 parallel
cp parallel sem

Watch the intro videos for GNU Parallel to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL284C9FF2488BC6D1

  • 3
    What is the justification for using GNU Parallel? To speed it up? Sep 28, 2014 at 0:18
  • That and you do not need to mess with \0 separated records.
    – Ole Tange
    Sep 28, 2014 at 16:46
  • 1
    I don't understand that last statement. I create a file with a line break in the file name and execute your command: cd /tmp && touch $'a\nz' && ls && find -maxdepth 1 -print | sort | parallel echo. Total false output. I know GNU Parallel now, but that answer misses the original question, doesn't it?
    – uav
    Jun 11, 2020 at 14:49
  • 1
    I know that it is bad practice to use crazy characters in file names - I am already including the blank space. I just see that parallel has a -0 parameter. Nice. No downvote. find -maxdepth 1 -print0 | sort -z | parallel -0 echo.
    – uav
    Jun 11, 2020 at 15:01
  • 1
    @uav In my 25 years of sysadmin I have never seen a user making a file with \n. I have seen plenty of files with ' space and ". So unless you have evil users or a filesystem with error, I will reckon you will not meet a file with \n that was not made by a fellow sysadm.
    – Ole Tange
    Jun 11, 2020 at 20:46

Some implementation of find supports ordered traversal directly via the -s parameter:

$ find -s . -name '*.json'

From the FreeBSD find man page:

-s       Cause find to traverse the file hierarchies in lexicographical
         order, i.e., alphabetical order within each directory.  Note:
         `find -s' and `find | sort' may give different results.

Some solutions here don't work correctly because the sort command takes the full "path" string to sorting instead of the filename string.

This is a quite complicated but working example of natural sorting results of the "find" command:

find every_minute -type f -name "*.sh" -printf '%f\t%p\n' | sort -V -k1 | cut -d$'\t' -f2 | tr '\n' '\0' | xargs -r0 -I {} echo 'Found: "{}"'


Found: "every_minute/api/1_build_synonyms.sh"
Found: "every_minute/search_module/2_rotate_index.sh"
Found: "every_minute/api/3_check_synonyms.sh"
Found: "every_minute/api/4_run_schedule.sh"
Found: "every_minute/search_module/10_test.sh"

Example of an invalid find every_minute -type f -name "*.sh" | sort -z | xargs -r0 echo command result:


Based on this answer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.