Say I create a bridge interface on linux (br0) and add to it some interfaces (eth0, tap0, etc.). My understanding is that this interface act like a virtual switch with all its interfaces/ports that I add to it.

What is the meaning of assigning a MAC and an IP address to that interface? Does the interface act as an additional port on the switch/bridge which allows other ports to access the host machine?

I have seen some pages talk about assigning an IP address to a bridge. Is the MAC assignation implied (or automatic)?


4 Answers 4


Because a bridge is an ethernet device it needs a MAC address. A linux bridge can originate things like spanning-tree protocol frames, and traffic like that needs an origin MAC address.

A bridge does not require an ip address. There are many situations in which you won't have one. However, in many cases you may have one, such as:

  • When the bridge is acting as the default gateway for a group of containers or virtual machines (or even physical interfaces). In this case it needs an ip address (because routing happens at the IP layer).

  • When your "primary" NIC is a member of the bridge, such that the bridge is your connectivity to the outside world. In this case, rather than assigning an ip address to (for example) eth0, you would assign it to the bridge device instead.

If the bridge is not required for ip routing, then it doesn't need an ip address. Examples of this situation include:

  • When the bridge is being used to create a private network of devices with no external connectivity, or with external connectivity provided through a device other than the bridge.
  • 5
    "Because a bridge is an ethernet device it needs a MAC address." Why? The devices connected to the bridges do have MAC addresses. But I don't think the bridge itself need one. As for the rest of the answer, does that means that the bridge interface act as an additional "port" on the bridge which allows other ports to access the host machine?
    – Gradient
    Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 2:29
  • The bridge is able to originate Ethernet frames, so it needs an address. Re: the second part of your question...sure.
    – larsks
    Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 2:55
  • 3
    But is it mandatory that the bridge interface has a MAC address? I mean, a physical switch does not have to have a MAC address to do its job, does it? So I would think that the interface does not require one either.
    – Gradient
    Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 3:32
  • 3
    A simple bridge is effectively a two-port switch, so it does not necessarily need any addresses. A simple bridge does not originate frames, it just receives a frame on one port and either forwards it on the other port, or drops it. Commented Oct 31, 2016 at 7:23
  • 4
    "such that the bridge is your connectivity to the outside world." Why? Why can't the primary NIC be still the connection to the outside world? Real hardware bridges also keep the IP address of the real link partners connected to them. Why not the linux wirtual bridge? Commented Nov 9, 2018 at 12:16

The bridge device listed with your other networking devices does not represent the virtual bridge, it represents a virtual NIC that is connected to the bridge. If you had a physical bridge connected with physical networking devices, you wouldn't see the physical bridge listed in your networking devices either -- but you would see your NIC that is connected to the bridge, which of course has its own MAC address like any other network device.

Assigning an IP adress to the bridge device (which, again, is actually a virtual NIC connected to the virtual bridge) allows your host device to route packets to the subnet created by the bridge and all of the devices attached to it. Neat!

While networking device tools such as iproute2 (with the ip link and ip addr commands) allow you to see the virtual NIC attached to the bridge, it is also possible to see the virtual bridge itself with the brctl program. The brctl show command will list all bridges and their attached interfaces. Here is an example using iproute and brctl with Linux bridges and tuntaps:

# ip link add br0 type bridge
# ip tuntap add dev tap0 mode tap
# ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap
# ip addr add broadcast dev br0
# ip addr add broadcast dev tap0
# ip addr add broadcast dev tap1
# brctl addif br0 tap0
# brctl addif br0 tap1
# brctl show
bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
br0             8000.2e22e593fe8c       no              tap0
# ip addr show to
11: br0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    inet brd scope global br0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
12: tap0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    inet brd scope global tap0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
13: tap1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    inet brd scope global tap1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Note that what is listed under "interfaces" in the output of brctl show are the other interafces attached to the bridge, in addition to the br0 interface that was automatically added when the bridge was created. (I guess Linux doesn't allow creating a virtual bridge with no attached devices, and bridges with no devices are automatically destroyed.) For the record, I haven't researched this in the kernel, nor am I a networking expert. I posted this because it seems to convincingly explain the rather confusing implementation of virtual bridges in Linux. I do not believe that the virtual bridges themselves even have MAC addresses.

  • 9
    actually you should use iproute2's bridge command to handle advanced cases not handled already by ip link. brctl is part of the obsolete tools like ifconfig. For simple bridge cases, ip link add ... type bridge and ip link set ... master br0 handles it all. There's also ip link show type bridge_slave or ip link show type bridge (and a few cases with bridge link show)
    – A.B
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 12:47

Yes, the bridge interface acts as an additional port.

After man 5 systemd.netdev:

A bridge device is a software switch, and each of its slave devices and the bridge itself are ports of the switch.

  • 1
    I believe a port on a switch is a transparent device on L2 and L3 it does not have a necessairly have to have a MAC or IP. if a switch runs in promiscuous mode it only stores the mac addresses of the divices connected. There is no reason for the bridge to have mac addresses.
    – theking2
    Commented Jun 6, 2021 at 17:22

The br0 and virbr0 interfaces listed by ip addr and ip link are tap interfaces that connect the host to the br0 bridge and virbr0 bridge respectively. This overloading of names can certainly be confusing.

So what is virbr0-nic?

This was not part of the original question but I'll add my 2 cents here since this confused me in the past. virbr0-nic is a dummy interface whose MAC address is used by the virbr0 bridge as its own mac address. This always-present interface is there to prevent virbr0's MAC address from changing when ports are dynamically added or removed from the bridge. The host does not send any traffic out the virbr0-nic interface.

See https://backreference.org/2010/07/28/linux-bridge-mac-addresses-and-dynamic-ports and https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-September/msg00038.html for an explanation.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .