What is the difference between Arch Linux distro and Tiny Core distro? I have yet to find a website which compares them.
closed as primarily opinion-based by heemayl, Michael Homer, jasonwryan, Anthon, Eric Renouf Oct 2 '16 at 11:13
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
There is not ”a difference”, there are almost too many to list. But basically:
Arch Linux is what you make it. Once installed, you are left with a minimal GNU/Linux system that you can cofigure however you want.
Whereas with Tiny Core, you boot into a predefined file manager and desktop (FLTK/FLWM) in a BusyBox environment.
Honestly, I would say that the only things that are similar between the two is that they have their own package managers, and that they are not based on any other distributions (except for ”dCore“ - based on Debian).