I'm playing around with Solaris 11.1, and have run into a bit of a problem...

I've installed three OS on my computer - LinuxMint, FreeBSD and Solaris - and have partitioned my harddrive (/dev/sda on LinuxMint) thus:

Disk 500GB

  • sda1 (Primary Partition): FreeBSD (UFS) 50GB
  • sda2 (PP): "Storage" (VFAT) 50GB
  • sda3 (PP): Solaris (zpool/zfs) 100GB
  • sda4 Extended Partition (what's left)
    • sda5 (Logical Partition): LinuxMint, / (root) 50GB
    • sda6 (LP): LinuxMint, /home 100GB
    • sda7 (LP): LinuxMint, swap 2.5GB

I used LinuxMint fdisk to set-up the partitions, using "old-style" DOS partition-table. I boot with grub in MBR, managed from LinuxMint. In addition, the Solaris-partition has it's own GRUB (to select between Solaris boot-enviroment) - it shows when I select "Solaris" from the MBR-GRUB.

In LinuxMint, all partitions are correctly identified and listed - and accessable. When I used gparted from LinuxMint, the disk is shown as partitioned as described above.

However in Solaris, it doesn't look like all partitions are correctly identified - in fact, I seem to only be able to access the Solaris-one... and it's sort of reported as being the only partiton on the disk (I think):

# zpool status
  pool: rpool
 state: ONLINE
  scan: none requested

    rpool     ONLINE       0     0     0
      c7d0s0  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors

I've not used Solaris much - and I still struggle with how it addresses disk-partitions - but in my mind, c7d0s0 means "controller: 7, disk: 0 and slice(?) 0" - I would've expected slice 2 or 3, since it's the 3rd partition on the disk.

When I use gparted (as root) under Solaris, my harddisk (/dev/sdk/c7d0p0) is reported as being one large block of "unalocated" with a size of 500GB - this matches the size of my disk... But since I'm working from it, I know there is at least a 100GB zpool there with several zfs filesystems.

Probably it's just me not knowing the ins and outs of Solaris enough - or how what commands to use - but I'm stomped...

What I would like to do, is mount the VFAT-partiton (/dev/sda2 under LinuxMint) under Solaris. As I understand it, Solaris is able to read VFAT-partitions (unlike for example ext4), and I'd like to use it to back-up some stuff from Solaris...

So how do I get Solaris to "see" the other partitions on the disk? What should be the device of the 2nd partition on the disk? I assume the mount command works pretty much like the one in Linux...

  • 1
    zpool is for ZFS only, df should print things better. No clue why gparted is going mad though.
    – grochmal
    Aug 23, 2016 at 3:20

1 Answer 1


What actually happens with Solaris is that when you create a partition, Solaris will create a "disk" inside it. So when you see c7d0s0, means controller 7 disk 0 slice 0. Now in x86 the disk is in fact your partition. Your full disk contains something along these lines: Physical disk:

  • sda1 - Linux
  • sda2 - VFAT partition
  • sda3 - Solaris partition with SMI label.
    • Slice 0 thourgh slice 8, slice 2 represents the full disk (x86 partition)
  • sda4
    • sda5
    • sda6
    • sda7

Traditionally if you want to mount the VFAT partition, you can do it like this:

mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c7d0p1 /path/to/mountpoint

if you want to see which partition have recognized filesystems, you can also do:

fstyp /dev/rdsk/c7d0p1 or p2 or p3

In addittion, you can do fdisk /dev/rdsk/c1t0p0 to list all the partitions, careful not to use destroying options.

You can also take a look here for more information.

  • Yes, that worked just fine! Thank you so very much for explaining this. Aug 23, 2016 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.