11

I have a directory on an nfs mount, which on the server is at /home/myname/.rubies

Root cannot access this directory:

[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ stat /home/mitchell.usher/.rubies
  File: `/home/mitchell.usher/.rubies'
  Size: 4096            Blocks: 8          IO Block: 32768  directory
Device: 15h/21d Inode: 245910      Links: 3
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x)  Uid: (  970/mitchell.usher)   Gid: (  100/   users)
Access: 2016-08-22 15:06:15.000000000 +0000
Modify: 2016-08-22 14:55:00.000000000 +0000
Change: 2016-08-22 14:55:00.000000000 +0000

[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ sudo !!
sudo stat /home/mitchell.usher/.rubies
stat: cannot stat `/home/mitchell.usher/.rubies': Permission denied

I am attempting to copy something from within that directory to /opt which only root has access to:

[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ cp .rubies/ruby-2.1.3/ -r /opt
cp: cannot create directory `/opt/ruby-2.1.3': Permission denied

[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ sudo !!
sudo cp .rubies/ruby-2.1.3/ -r /opt
cp: cannot stat `.rubies/ruby-2.1.3/': Permission denied

Obviously I can do the following (and is what I've done for the time being):

[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ cp -r .rubies/ruby-2.1.3/ /tmp/
[mitchell.usher@server ~]$ sudo cp -r /tmp/ruby-2.1.3/ /opt/

Is there any way to do this that wouldn't involve copying it as an intermediary step or changing permissions?

  • cp -Rp /home/mitchell.usher/.rubies /tmp/templocation; sudo mv /tmp/templocation/ruby-2.1.3 /opt will this not work ? If no, why ? – MelBurslan Aug 22 '16 at 15:31
  • @MelBurslan that's what I did, as stated in the question. But let's say it's a 50 GB file that won't fit anywhere else on the filesystem, then I wouldn't be able to cp <file> /tmp/tmpfile – Mitch Aug 22 '16 at 17:45
29

You can use tar as a buffer process

cd .rubies
tar cf - ruby-2.1.3 | ( cd /opt && sudo tar xvfp - )

The first tar runs as you and so can read your home directory; the second tar runs under sudo and so can write to /opt.

  • 1
    How is this on memory? If I have a 10 GB file, is that going to fill 10 GB of memory before it pipes and un-tars, or will it un-tar as it tars? – Mitch Aug 22 '16 at 18:39
  • 5
    They run in parallel; a typical pipe has a 64Kbyte buffer. Nothing to worry about :-) unix.stackexchange.com/questions/11946/… for pipe size details. – Stephen Harris Aug 22 '16 at 18:50
  • See also In what order do piped commands run? (in particular, my answer). – Scott Aug 22 '16 at 21:12
  • cpio can be used in much the same way. – Toby Speight Aug 23 '16 at 7:34
  • If you have GNU tar, you can save the subshell by using its -C argument to change directory (i.e. tar cf - ruby-2.1.3 | sudo tar -C /opt xpf -). Might be worth mentioning that you want to ensure that sudo won't ask your password (e.g. through a sudoers entry or cached credentials). – Toby Speight Aug 23 '16 at 7:37
6

You could use rsync or scp to copy from user@localhost to the local directory.

Example for rsync:

# rsync "$real_user@localhost:$PWD/.rubies/ruby-2.1.3" /opt

You could alternatively

$ rsync .rubies/ruby-2.1.3 "root@localhost:/opt"

if you let root access localhost directly (not recommended; we normally prefer root access to be via sudo).

-4

You can make a second entry in the FAT (or whatever).
I do this for my HOSTS file. I have a link in a writable directory that refers to the file and it has different permissions, so I have /Hosts/HOSTS that I can modify easily, and the changes are put in both (i.e. "the one") file(s). It's 2 entries for 1 file. I don't remember the command, sorry.

For you, you make a link to /opt for all the files in .rubies, and when you change anything in /opt, it is the same file as in .rubies.

  • 4
    This is false and misleading, besides not answering the question. – Wildcard Aug 23 '16 at 1:37
  • It is only false because we're dealing with a different file system. The answerer was obviously referring to hard links which do operate as mentioned, although not applicable for this question. – Julie Pelletier Aug 23 '16 at 4:13
  • Thanks Wildcard, I had a line in my answer about getting a bunch of flack but it was edited out when Michael improved it. :p – Engineer Aug 25 '16 at 1:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.