2

Consider the following command:

ls
dir1 dir2 file1
x1   x2   y2

when this output is piped into e.g. grep each file/directory is processed as an 'item'.

ls | grep f
file1

So obviously there is a distinction between the actual output that a ls produces and the input that is processed by grep.

Since grep operates on lines one could expect that ls | grep f would show the whole first line, namely: dir1 dir2 file1

What am I missing here? What is the mechanism behind this behavior?

  • 2
    It's all in the (ls) manual... The default format shall be to list one entry per line to standard output; the exceptions are to terminals or when one of the -C, -m, or -x options is specified. – don_crissti Jul 11 '16 at 12:29
4

It's possible for a command to detect when its output is going to a TTY or not. Thus in this particular case, when ls detects that its output is not going to a TTY, it behaves as if -1 were passed as an argument.

You can see this, and that grep is not doing anything special by using cat:

ls | cat
  • alright, this makes sense. Does anybody know how e.g. a bash script could create an output switch for the cases two (tty and stdout)? Would be interesting to see this. – Anton Harald Jul 11 '16 at 12:34
  • Not sure what you mean. But if you're asking how to detect whether output is going to a TTY in a shell script, use if [ -t 1 ]; ... or if test -t 1; ... – Patrick Jul 11 '16 at 12:38
  • yes, this line was the thing I was looking for. – Anton Harald Jul 11 '16 at 18:44
1

To see how ls behaves when its output is being redirected, you can try running

ls | cat

or

ls -1

which is how ls behaves when its output doesn't go to a TTY.

  • There is more difference like for terminal output option -q is set by default – Philippos May 16 '17 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.