12
  • ls -a (I consider -a an option)

  • sudo -u username (-u = option, username = arg)

  • chmod 664 my-dir (664 = option, my-dir = arg)

I can't think of an example that might say "this is a flag" except perhaps when looking at dir listing:

-r--------. 1 david david   3344 May 19 17:48 611056.pdf

This has the "read flag" set for the owner, but that's all. What's to stop me from calling that a "read option"?

I write and edit technical documentation, primarily in DocBook XML, and I'm looking for an explanation of the difference, which is consistent and accurate as possible. However, I'm already seeing a pattern forming:

  1. flags tend to be Booleans. e.g., setenforce 0
  2. options help define how a command should behave. Some may be optional.
  3. arguments tell commands what object to operate on.

I could see myself combining flags and options (some options may have a dozen possible values, but Booleans only have two). Arguments appear sufficiently different to maintain them as such.

closed as primarily opinion-based by Ulrich Schwarz, Anthon, garethTheRed, Jenny D, Archemar May 26 '16 at 7:38

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    "What's to stop me from calling …"? O.o Nothing. Just as nothing stops me from calling a spade a tree. – muru May 26 '16 at 3:51
  • @muru - although an English dictionary will disagree with your assertion. – DarkHeart May 26 '16 at 4:12
  • 3
    To make things more confusing, I'd also call an option that does not take a parameter/argument a flag, as in your ls -a example. (To me, a flag is a boolean variable.) – Ulrich Schwarz May 26 '16 at 5:06
  • 3
    They're dog kennels; all thirty of them.    :-)     ⁠ – Scott May 26 '16 at 6:02
  • The pattern that you see is only there because you narrow down the things you want to see. One way to create a TAR file (that I have been using for more than 30 years) and not e.g. extract it is: tar c abc.txt > x.tar, in there c is a function. You are trying to call that an option and that is completely inappropriate. – Anthon May 26 '16 at 14:05
15

There are no consistent definitions of the terms "option", "argument", and "flag", and there is no central authority within the software development world that could enforce their usage. This happens with much terminology: after 30+ years of using the word "directory", I now have to deal with people using the word "folder" who have been confused by Microsoft's new-speak.

There are different ways that consensus definitions for terms can come about in programming. In the case of "argument"/"option"/"flag", canonical manuals and tutorials for programming languages have helped to enforce usage, as has the terms used in common libraries.

For instance, the things you put on the command line after a command are often called "arguments" to the command, by analogy with arguments to a function call, and this is probably partly because they are called "arguments" in the C manual (hence argc and argv). The argparse Python library also helps to enforce the term "argument". However, I have also seen them being called "parameters".

The term "option" is derived from "optional", which implies they can be left out. The getopt C library is one use of this term. But there is precedent for "options" that are not actually optional: for example, the argparse manual states that one can create a "required option" (although it also says that this is "generally considered bad form"). Options are often preceded by a single (-) or double (--, long-option) dash, but there are well-known commands that do not require or enforce dash usage for options (e.g., tar, ps, and dd). An option can itself take an argument (e.g., -w80 and --color=always), or occasionally multiple arguments.

"Flags" are, in my experience, the same as options, but usually do not take arguments themselves and essentially represent boolean on-off switches.

On a broader note, since every programmer has the option to try and look up some standard way of doing things and naming things, but can also reinvent the wheel without much extra cost, naming is never going to be consistent. And once you have documented your code, and it is clear what new meaning you have given to these words by giving examples, those names and meanings might just stick if there are enough people who pick them up from your code.

6

A flag is a type of option, an option of boolean type, and is always false by default (e.g. --verbose, --quiet, --all, --long, etc).

An option tells the function how to act (e.g. -a, -l, --verbose, --output , -name , -c , etc), whist an arguments tells the function what to act on/from (e.g. *, file1, hostname, database).

  • So in your definition, in git pull git://bla/bla, the pull is an argument that tells gitwhat to work on. – Anthon May 26 '16 at 5:56
  • 1
    @Anthon no, there are operators (switches/flags/parameters), arguments, and commands. pull is a command. One can think of commands as extensions of the application's name: git pull <...> is equivalent to an application called git-pull. When the application has commands, each command makes the application do something completely different. – Ziggy Crueltyfree Zeitgeister May 26 '16 at 6:42
  • The git people might call it a command, but that is not always what it is called e.g. for tar, using c for creating is called a function. And that is exactly the problem: there is no standardisation of terms, even if it looks like you think there is from your answer – Anthon May 26 '16 at 7:46
  • a flag doesn't have to be false by default. providing the flag on the command line just reverses its default state (on-->off, or off-->on). some people call that a toggle to distinguish it from a flag. others think the distinction is unimportant. – cas May 26 '16 at 8:16