2

I'm currently using both iozone and fio to test my disk performance. However, iozone show much much poor speed than what is shown from fio. (about 1/3)

Now the question for me is which number should I use and why there is such a gap.

The command I used are:

iozone -s 40G -i 0 -i 1 -b /mnt/ext/40Gtest.xls -f /mnt/ext/iofile.ioz -w -Racz
fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=/mnt/ext/testfile --bs=64k --iodepth=64 --size=4G --readwrite=read
1

I don't know iozone but your fio job has a non-tiny block size, you're telling it to bypass the Linux page cache, the file fio is using is only 4Gbytes big and you are allowing up to 64 I/Os to be in flight at the same time. You would need to at least make sure that your iozone job has equivalents of those - at least the going direct, the blocksize and number of I/Os in flight will have a giant impact.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.