What method is best to use for mounting a NFS share from another machine? Mount using /etc/fstab entry or Mount using autofs?
what is the difference between them?

2 Answers 2


Autofs , is auto mounting filesystem on demand like when ever you need it.

NFS is like mounting a complete partition remotely and you will have availability of whole content of the partition.

But there are few advantages with autofs over nfs

Advantages of AutoFS

1 Shares are accessed automatically and transparently when a user tries to access any files or directories under the designated mount point of the remote filesystem to be mounted.

2 Booting time is significantly reduced because no mounting is done at boot time.

3 Network access and efficiency are improved by reducing the number of permanently active mount points.

4 Failed mount requests can be reduced by designating alternate servers as the source of a filesystem.


The difference will affect you when the machine boots up (like after a reboot). Your NFS mount will not be present. With some Operating Systems the machine will not boot.

/etc/fstab is read early in the boot sequence to mount filesystems

autofs is a daemon started later in the boot sequence. At a high level:

  1. First your filesystems are mounted from /etc/fstab
  2. Next, your network is brought online
  3. Subsequently, the automounter daemon autofs starts up

I have seen a machine unable to boot because someone added the following to /etc/fstab: /local/path

The machine tried and failed to load that NFS mount point because the network service had not yet started.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .