17

Here's what I would like:

Start with a virtual system, with no installed packages. Then I invoke a tool, similar to apt-get to ask it to compute the dependencies and mark all the packages that would be installed as installed.

Let me be clear: It says the packages are installed, but there are no files actually installed.

Then, if I ask for more packages to be "installed", it may propose to add or remove other packages. It wouldn't actually remove packages, but obviously just mark them removed.

This would be useful because, I would be able to test the installation of packages on a bare Debian or Ubuntu system. It would, allow me to know if a package is installable given a certain scenario.

Doing this to an actual installation would take a lot of disk space and time.

apt has a "simulate" option, but it does not mark packages as installed.

migrated from stackoverflow.com Oct 28 '11 at 11:07

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

11

You're probably best off hooking into one of the scripting interfaces that Debian has for their various package tools and writing your own simulator.

(Edit: I can't find dpkg-perl and dpkg-python anymore. dpkg-awk and dpkg-ruby exist, but they don't look like they'll do the job.)

However: Debian has a tool "equivs" that lets you build "empty" packages that just satisfy dependencies, but install no files beyond the control files. http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=equivs

dpkg and apt-get both have options to run with different administration and root directories. The dpkg man page has them, but the apt-get one is buried in apt.conf.

DIRECTORIES

The configuration item RootDir has a special meaning. ...

aptitude lets you pick and choose what to install, and then "commits" it by running dpkg and/or apt with the right settings. Playing around with it might be sufficient for some of your needs, though you'll want to save the settings before hand, and restore afterword.

  • 1
    Can you point me to one of these scripting interfaces you mention? – Nicolas Marchildon Sep 29 '08 at 18:12
-1

This will just give you a severely broken system. Why do you want to do something this bizarre in the first place?

I suspect this is a XY problem: You need X, figure out a way to do it is through Y, and ask about Y. Without knowing what X is, there is no way we could give reasonable solutions for it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.