This question already has an answer here:
To "install" a binary compiled from source the best-practice would be to put it under the directory:
On some systems that path is already in your PATH variable, if not you can add it by adapting the PATH variable in one of your profile configuration files
dd is a low level copy tool that is mostly used to copy exactly sized blocks of the source which could be for example a file or a device.
cp is the common command to copy files and directories also recursively with the option
-r and by preserving the permissions with the option
install is mostly similar to
cp but provides additionally the option to set the destination file properties directly without having to use
cp your files to
/usr/local/bin and adapt the
PATH variable if needed. That's what I would do.
The primary difference between
cp is that if the destination file already exists
install unlinks it first.
This difference is not pointed out in the manual pages. The things listed in the other answers also matter -- both programs have different options, and also GNU
install has different options than BSD
install so portable Makefiles are limited to a common subset.
Why unlinking (which can be also done by
cp) matters? If you have a file with two hardlinks and modify it using one of the hardlinks, it's modified also in the other place on the filesystem. But if you remove one of the hardlinks first and replace it with modified file, the other place keeps the original version.
More probable scenario is that you update a program or a library while it is in use. If the binary is unlinked first, it won't affect the running program. Here is a nice post with more details: http://en.chys.info/2009/05/install-vs-cp-and-mmap/