6

I have noticed that when I access my Samba share from Windows, the smbd daemon will always use aprox 10-20% CPU - no matter if the share is used or not from Windows. Even if I close the share/window, smbd will continue using CPU and only a reboot/shutdown of my Windows can get the CPU usage down to normal.

This is when I have just rebooted/started my Windows - the share is mapped but not accessed yet. It will have this "red" status in Windows until I access it:

Share as seen from Windows after a reboot

Before I do anything else I check the smbstatus and top on my Linux:

smbstatus after a reboot

There is no problem so far - the CPU usage is not noticable at all in top so everything is still good.

BUT ... when I then access the share from Windows, the Linux CPU immediately raises to 10-20%:

High CPU when drive is accessed

And the smbstatus always shows some locked(?) files which for sure(?) is not accessed from my Windows:

Files accessed when mapped drive is accessed

The testparm shows my smb.conf configuration:

Samba configuration file

The only way I can "fix this" is by either rebooting my Windows or unmap the drive/share.

One more strange thing - when I have unmapped the share/drive, I can of course still access the share via UNC... and when accessing it through UNC it does NOT raise the CPU at all!? Weird!

My hardware is quite recent/uptodate:

Server: Core i5 1.5-2.9GHz dual core/HT 16GB RAM Samsung 850 Pro (512GB)

Client: Windows 8.1

I have used the same configuration on a CentOS 6 installation without any problems. I have also tried disabling whatever I think can communicate with the network share on my Windows computer (antivirus and backup software).

Can anyone help nailing this problem down?

  • 1
    I observe the same behavior on one of my samba servers, did you ever find an explanation for that and is it really abnormal? – Preexo Jan 21 '15 at 8:10
  • If samba isn't the dance you want to dance use NFS. Linux/*nix native network fs and maybe a bit less resource hogging. superuser.com/questions/525473/… – Michael D. Feb 13 '17 at 8:33
  • I've the same problem with macOS clients here. – TCB13 Apr 19 '17 at 12:42
1

Possibly a bit late but I found this, while having a similar problem.

I have a Raspberry Pi B+ with samba configured as a drive store, with a direct connection to my laptop over Ethernet.

My setup is as follows:

  • several external hard drives connected to raspberry pi.
  • Raspberry pi uses direct Ethernet connection to my laptop.

I have found:

  • high cpu usage by smbd when reading from external (45%)
  • high cpu usage by mount.ntfs when writing to external (46%)

Considering specs of B+, it seems somewhat believable since a simple apt update takes a minute of so if just refreshing list...

This might make for some good reading

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.