I would like to print the number of folders (recursive, excluding hidden folders) in a given CWD / current directory. What command, or series of commands can I use to ascertain this information?

| improve this question | | | | |
  • (1) What do you mean by "a given root directory"? A Unix/Linux system has one root directory. (2) Have you made an attempt to solve this yourself? What have you tried? (Hint: How would you identify the folders in a given folder, and how would you count things?) – Scott Nov 11 '14 at 0:57
  • base dir? directory containing other directories (which in turn contain other directories)? yes, i've made an attempt, but wc won't work because it counts files. would ls work with a for loop in a bash script or is there something else I'm missing? – jml Nov 11 '14 at 1:03
  • What about symlinks to a directory? – Hauke Laging Nov 11 '14 at 1:09

This will find the number of non-hidden directories in the current working directory:

ls -l | grep "^d" | wc -l


To make this recursive, use the -R option to ls -l:

ls -lR | grep "^d" | wc -l
| improve this answer | | | | |
  • Thanks. I need this to be recursive; is there a modification that would comply? EDIT: this doesn't seem to omit hidden dirs – jml Nov 11 '14 at 1:48
  • If it is not omitting hidden directories, do you have an alias set for ls that is listing hidden directories by default? – Timothy Martin Nov 11 '14 at 2:05
  • Good point. I had one in my bash_profile. Thanks for the recursion update as well. – jml Nov 11 '14 at 2:10
  • Be cautious with the -R flag for ls. Check the output without the wc -l pipe, because I think ls -lR adds blank lines and dir names between files, which might throw off your count. – transistor1 Nov 11 '14 at 18:36
  • 3
    @transistor1 Good point. In this case however the grep "^d" displays only the entries which have a d at the beginning of the line. Blank/non-directory lines should not be displayed without the wc -l or counted with the wc -l. – Timothy Martin Nov 11 '14 at 18:47

In the GNU land:

find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d -printf . | wc -c


find . -type d ! -name . -printf . -prune | wc -c

In bash:

shopt -s dotglob
for dir in *; do
  test -d "$dir" || continue
  test . = "$dir" && continue
  test .. = "$dir" && continue
echo $count
| improve this answer | | | | |
  • -printf is GNU specific, while -mindepth/-maxdepth are now found in a few other implementations. – Stéphane Chazelas Oct 31 '18 at 20:40

echo $(($(find -type d | wc -l) - 1)) is one way (subtract 1 from the wc -l to remove the current dir). You can tweak the options to find to find different things.

echo $(($(find -type d -not -path '*/\.*' | wc -l) - 1)) - to exclude the hidden dirs

As I mentioned in the comments, the heart of this expression is really find -type d, which finds all directories.

Note this finds all subfolders as well - you can control the depth using the -maxdepth flag.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • that's interesting - so, there's no built in command to do something like this? – jml Nov 11 '14 at 1:16
  • 1
    @jml - Someone else likely has something simpler, but find is my go-to for file finding & counting. The "meat" of this ugly expression is really just find -type d, which finds any directories. – transistor1 Nov 11 '14 at 1:22

Did you try tree command?

tree -d /path/to/maindir| awk END{print}
| improve this answer | | | | |

In zsh:

(){echo $#} *(N/)


(){echo $#} **/*(N/)

Add the D glob qualifiers if you also want to count hidden directories.

POSIX equivalents:

ls -p | grep -c /

(add the -A option to ls for hidden ones)


LC_ALL=C find .//. ! -name . \( -name '.*' -prune -o -type d -print \) |
  grep -c //


LC_ALL=C ls -Rqn . | grep -c '^d'

To include hidden ones:

LC_ALL=C find .//. ! -name . -type d | grep -c //


LC_ALL=C ls -ARqn . | grep -c '^d'
| improve this answer | | | | |

find . -type d -not -path '.' -printf 0 | wc -c ;

Recursively find all directories (-type d) within current directory (find .) that is not (.) directory and print 0 for each directory found. Then wc -c counts the number of characters (0) from the previous command output.

| improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.