I heard that bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4 is a CVE-7169 patch for CentOS 5.
So I found an announcement from CentOS website below.

Now I'm wondering, According to below description, bash-3.2.-33.el5_10.4 is for CentOS 5.10. Then, is that OK if I install bash-3.2.-33.el5_10.4 into CentOS 5.8??

Note: The above RPMS, built with the ".el5_10" dist tag are built against CentoS-5.10 for CentOS-5.10. The source code was not modified, but the packages in the build root are the current CentOS-5.10 packages.

There is also a set of packages built against the upcoming CentOS-5.11 with a ".el5_11" dist tag that will be an upgrade when 5.11 is released and all the packages in that build root are from the upcoming CentOS-5.11 release. The ".el5_11" announcement and package will be done as a zero-day update to CentOS-5.11.

We wanted to get the Important bash update out for 5.10 while also getting the proper packages out for 5.11 as well, so this was the solution.


Almost certainly a .el5_10 or .el5_11 binary bash rpm will install on a .el5_8 box.

Try-and-see by doing cd /tmp rpm2cpio bash*.rpm |cpio -dim and then try to run bash cd /tmp ./bin/bash

If you can execute bash, then you can try to install the package: rpm -Uvh bash*.rpm

Worst that happens is that the upgrade will fail for other reasons.

  • Thank you for you answer. However, I'm not curious just about this rpm. As you know, CVE-7169 is critical problems, so I think there should be every type of CentOS versions. But there is only one rpm file for CentOS 5.10. Why is that? Here is CVE-2014-7169 patch links. lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/…
    – tiratano
    Sep 30 '14 at 8:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.