Predictive Self Healing is a feature of the OS to predict, detect a fault with one of its components and automatically repair it. MINIX, Solaris OS and Linux on POWER all have this. But is it available in modern Linux distributions on x86 platform? Or will be?

  • 1
    FYI, RHEL has self healing capabilities, at least on file system level. Seems somthing that btrfs would do too.
    – Braiam
    Sep 24, 2014 at 16:52
  • Actually, the article you linked says that the Linux in Linux on POWER does not have self healing capabilities. While Linux has all the monitoring and configuration capabilites to implement "self-healing", I don't know about any ready to use systems. I suppose systemd will be able to do it better in a foreseeable version anyways.
    – Bananguin
    Sep 24, 2014 at 20:05
  • @Bananguin The blog post comment also mentions servicelog, but how can we setup self-healing using it?
    – niutech
    Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08

3 Answers 3


Right now (as of late 2015) it depends on which level you would like to have self-healing capabilities.

I found a similar discussion here about the same issue where one of the "linux guys"1 replied that:

Doing this in-kernel would violate the separation of policy and mechanism. There's nothing wrong with providing the hooks necessary for userspace to do this, but it's generally userspace's responsibility to decide what should be done when a possible problem is detected. [in short..] A distro/vendor problem, not a kernel development problem.

Hence, from a kernel perspective, it seems that there is no intention to support this - unlike Minix, for instance. Having said this, I have not found the specific policy he's talking about or any direct statement by Linus about this.

From a user-space perspective there seems to be at least attempts to deal with this issue on file system level. As summery of another post and the corresponding comments, it is believed that whereas other OS deal with data corruption much better btrfs seems to be on a good way to implement this feature for Linux-based OSs as well. However, although claimed to be stable, it is by no means yet as powerful as SUN's (BSD-based) ZFS as can be read here2.

1 i.e. Chris Snook - former Red Hat associate

2 very exhaustive blog about benchmarking btrfs which comes to a rather negative conclusion (as of 2015/09/16)


No, because the Linux kernel is monolithic. It's one large binary rather than being made up of several smaller programs that could be restarted individually (as exist in a microkernel design such as MINIX and Hurd).

Personally, I don't find this feature at all interesting. If something crashes, you're probably going to lose some state data, and even if the system manages to partially restart and hobble along after the first error, it could just go on to make more errors due to the unexpected state change.

The correct way to do fault tolerance is to distribute over multiple computers and have them check each others' work at a higher level of semantics than the kernel/OS layers.


Although Linux kernel does not provide self-healing functionality out of the box, there are at least two projects aiming at it:

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .