I type "abc" then [newline]. Now I want to effectively just remove the [newline] to remove the current line (dd) and then jump to the end of "abc" ($).

It might seem odd to ask for something shorter than dd$ but doing dd$ instead of using [backspace] as it would work in most editors feels out of flow and makes me curious whether there is something more concise.

But maybe dd$ is already the recommended command for that situation.


You can set backspace to work like in other editors:

set backspace=indent,eol,start

Sanity's great.


Note: dd$ only work at the end of the buffer, where the dd will automatically move the cursor on line up. Elsewhere, it's ddk$.

If you're in insert mode, you can alternatively also use <BS> to remove the empty line and move the cursor to the end of the previous line. This also works from normal mode: i<BS><Esc> with this setting:

set backspace=indent,eol,start

but it's not shorter.

Why do you need the cursor to be at the end of the previous line (in normal mode)? I don't see that requirement often. If you want to restart editing there, you can just use A from anywhere in the line.

  • actually the initial state would be insert mode. the situation where you think about starting a new paragraph (newline) and then decide to instead just append another sentence - then you want to just go back to the ende of the last sentence and the newly created line becomes superfluous. – Raffael Sep 24 '14 at 12:04
  • I don't know what configurations you guys are using, but using the actual vim (vi improved), in insert mode the backspace key performs exactly as in "other editors". Or am I missing something? – Bananguin Sep 24 '14 at 20:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.