69

I'm relatively new to programming as a whole and some tutorials have been telling me to use ls -l to look at files in a directory and others have been saying ll. I know that ls is a short list, but is there a difference between the other two?

  • 8
    You may want to take a look at which ll. You will probably discover that ll is actually an alias for ls -l. – HalosGhost Jun 17 '14 at 23:04
  • So then what is the difference between ls any other command I put into the shell? If I type which ls I get alias ls='ls --color=auto' /bin/ls, but if I type (for example) which cd I get /usr/bin/which: no cd in (........). EDIT: I tried it again with which mkdir and I got /bin/mkdir. What is the distinction between these commands that some of them are stored(?) in /usr/bin and some are apparently not? – Jon Jun 18 '14 at 21:45
  • this is an affect of your distro's default $PATH. ls is very often aliased, so your shell reports the alias (which takes precedence over the binary) and the binary's actual location (in your case, /bin/ls). If which could not find cd, then something appears terribly wrong. – HalosGhost Jun 20 '14 at 7:30
  • 2
    cd is a shell builtin keyword, not a program found in a filesystem. Use type cd and type ls to see what I mean. Some commands are simply overriden by shell builtins: echo exists in /bin/echo, but in bash and in fact most of modern shells, a builtin echo function is called instead (which usually has extended features). type actually tells you which one it is. – orion Feb 4 '15 at 10:00
102

On many systems, ll is an alias of ls -l:

$ type ll
ll is aliased to `ls -l'

They are the same.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    ll is aliased to `ls -ltr' - I am using red hat 6 – rdp May 27 '15 at 14:51
  • 4
    in Ubuntu 14.04 ll is aliased to 'ls -alF' – Viktor Apr 12 '16 at 3:15
  • 5
    Also ls -alF in Ubuntu 12.04, 16.04, and likely many more. – Paul Nov 5 '16 at 16:58
  • 3
    For me on macOS Sierra ll is aliased to ls -lh – Zorgatone Apr 20 '17 at 12:44
  • 1
    zsh: command not found: ll :( – Harinder Jan 10 at 22:33
14

As noted, ll is often defined as an alias of ls -l. In fact, ls is often an alias itself:

$ which ls
alias ls='ls --color=auto'
/usr/bin/ls

The actual command is ls which above is found in /usr/bin. ll is intended as a convenience, but you cannot rely on it being defined on all *nix systems, so it is good to know what it is really doing.

| improve this answer | |
  • Great answer. I can't help by add that this is one of the reasons why relying on ls in automation (especially ad-hoc one-liners) is usually a bad idea. It has several options that change its output, and many ways to specify them. With different distributions choosing different defaults, it tends to lead to headaches. – ctt Jun 18 '14 at 2:30
  • I haven't seen any popular distribution to alias ls to anything else than ls --color=auto. It's either that or there is no alias. – phoops Jun 18 '14 at 7:02
6

Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04, 16.04, 18.04:

laike9m@laike9m1:~$ type ll
ll is aliased to `ls -alF'
| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Also 12.04 and 16.04, but that is all I have available to test right now. – Paul Nov 5 '16 at 17:00
  • I can confirm also 18.04 – Max Yudin Nov 20 '19 at 9:21
3

In most cases, ll does not work in shell scripts.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    What happens is that typically commands like ll are really aliases, that aren't defined when running scripts. – vonbrand Jun 18 '14 at 7:57
  • 3
    Some people have the alias in the .profile, and the alias is working in an interactive shell. After debugging/testing a new script, the script suddenly fails in crontab. Cron does not read the .profile. – Walter A Jun 18 '14 at 9:49
  • 1
    This is not an answer to the question, but should be a comment instead. From my little understanding, aliases are deprecated in shell scripts. – cornflakes24 Jan 23 '16 at 20:21
  • I say "most" but it does not on mine, and i use ls -l – travelingbones Apr 27 '17 at 16:26
2

ll is an alias for ls -l.

The option -l tells the command to use a long list format. It gives back several columns, not shown when the simple ls command is used. These columns include:

  • Permissions

  • Number of hardlinks

  • File owner

  • File group

  • File size

  • Modification

  • time

  • Filename

| improve this answer | |
0

ll is actually aliased to `ls -l' If you run ll, then it will show you files in the shell then you to press Enter to see the next files (more.. option). If you run ls -l, then all files will be displayed at a time.

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.