Is it possible to have one IPv4 and one IPv6 IP set (
ipset(8)) within the same rule?
I have several rules that depend on one set of IPv4 addresses and another set of IPv6 addresses respectively, but are otherwise identical.
I should add that there is a feature in
ipset(8) which sounded hopeful, but turns out to offer no solution to the problem at hand:
list:set The list:set type uses a simple list in which you can store set names. [...] Please note: by the ipset command you can add, delete and test the setnames in a list:set type of set, and not the presence of a set's member (such as an IP address).