The Heartbleed exploit (CVE-2014-0160) makes SSL connections using OpenSSL vulnerable to private key leakage.
Does it mean that official update channels in RHEL/CentOS/etc. and Debian/Ubuntu shall be considered compromised?
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityThe Heartbleed exploit (CVE-2014-0160) makes SSL connections using OpenSSL vulnerable to private key leakage.
Does it mean that official update channels in RHEL/CentOS/etc. and Debian/Ubuntu shall be considered compromised?
Packages and lists in the Debian / Ubuntu repositories are signed by GPG keys. The transport is not secured with SSL (packages are transferred over just over plain ftp or http). I am not that familiar with RHEL / CentOS, but if RPMs are signed too, then the same should apply.