OS: Scheduler, VMM, IPC, FS Drivers, dispatchers, VFS
The above would be a monolithic kernel. In a monolithic kernel all core OS functions are separate from user space. Functions such as the FS are handled completely by the kernel. This leaves the end user/dev open to write applications that rely solely on the kernel to emulate and process the functions. The BSD tree, AIX, and HP-UX are good examples of monolithic kernels.
User Mode: Application IPC, Unix Server, Drivers, File Server
OS: Basic IPC, VMM, Scheduling
This is a microkernel. A microkernel is responsible solely for physical emulation of the machine code. It provides a more secure functionality, but also allows for better hardware processing. User space is where drivers are handled, sometimes grating DMA. Also, it can improve computing processing time if the user space is streamlined for direct machine emulation. JXOS and various nanokernels are good examples.
User Mode: Drivers, Unix Server, Application IPC
OS: Microkernel, Kernel Drivers, IPC, HAL
This is a hybrid kernel. A hybrid kernel is mix between a monolithic kernel and a microkernel. Software drivers are handled in user mode, but hardware drivers are handled by the kernel. This allows for a lot of flexibility in design, as some packages and application functions can run directly against the kernel. However, this leaves the kernel open to a lot of security vulnerabilities. The most well-known hybrid kernel is Windows NT.
My architect was testing my knowledge of kernels, and this is what I sent him. He said that I wasn't wrong, I just have a very different approach to it. When interrogated about it, he just told me it was different. How is it different? Does it look different?