I've not used dd all that much, but so far it's not failed me yet. Right now, I've had a dd going for over 12 hours - I'm writing an image back to the disk it came from - and I'm getting a little worried, as I was able to dd from the disk to the image in about 7 hours.

I'm running OSX 10.6.6 on a MacBook with a Core 2 Duo at 2.1ghz/core with 4gb RAM. I'm reading from a .dmg on a 7200rpm hard drive (the boot drive), and I'm writing to a 7200rpm drive connected over a SATA-to-USB connector. I left the blocksize at default, and the image is about 160gb.

EDIT: And, after 14 hours of pure stress, the dd worked perfectly after all. Next time, though, I'm going to run it through pv and track it with strace. Thanks to everyone for all your help.

  • 7
    Not answering your question, but your times are quite high IMO. Did you remember to pass a bigger block size to dd other than the default 512 bytes? dd ... bs=16M is my suggestion, given your RAM, disk size and speed. – Juliano Apr 13 '11 at 20:29
  • I didn't, simply because I wanted to play it safe. I'll try that next time, though. Thanks. – eckza Apr 14 '11 at 1:26
  • In my experience, dd on Mac OS X has a tendency to freeze to the point where I can't even kill the process, but have to restart the system. I resort to doing work on a Linux VM then. – ssc Jun 12 '14 at 18:58

13 Answers 13

up vote 164 down vote accepted

You can send dd a certain signal using the kill command to make it output its current status. The signal is INFO on BSD systems (including OSX) and USR1 on Linux. In your case:

kill -INFO $PID

You can find the process id ($PID above) with the ps command; or see pgrep and pkill alternatives on mac os x for more convenient methods.

More simply, as AntoineG points out in his answer, you can type ctrl-T at the shell running dd to send it the INFO signal.

As an example on Linux, you could make all active dd processes output status like this:

pkill -USR1 -x dd

After outputting its status, dd will continue coping.

  • 9
    Oh, very cool. You can combine those with pkill -USR1 -x dd – Michael Mrozek Apr 13 '11 at 17:26
  • 9
    @kivetros: On BSD systems, you need to send the INFO signal. Linux doesn't have a SIGINFO and uses USR1 instead. – Gilles Apr 13 '11 at 18:50
  • 5
    The SIGUSRx signals are for programs to do what they want with, as opposed to having a standardized meaning. SIGWINCH, for example, is raised when the terminal has changed its size and the program might need to redraw its screen. The operating system doesn't send SIGUSRx's so they are available for custom uses. – LawrenceC Apr 14 '11 at 1:17
  • 11
    Sending dd the USR1 signal too soon after it has started (i.e. in a bash script, the line after you started it) will in fact terminate it. Put a 0.1 second sleep in between and it will output its progress properly. By the way, a very nice dd command to test USR1/INFO on is dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null. :) – Lauritz V. Thaulow Apr 14 '11 at 8:51
  • 11
    BTW, all "true" BSDs send SIGINFO to foreground process group if status character (Ctrl+T by default) is sent to terminal. But I don't know whether is it true for MacOSX. – Netch Nov 1 '12 at 20:14

Under OS X (didn't try on Linux), you can simply type Ctrl+T in the terminal running dd. It will print the same output as kill -INFO $PID, plus the CPU usage:

load: 1.40  cmd: dd 34536 uninterruptible 3.49u 64.58s
5020305+0 records in
5020304+0 records out
2570395648 bytes transferred in 4284.349974 secs (599950 bytes/sec)

I found out about it reading this thread, and trying to open a new tab in my terminal but mixing +T with Ctrl+T.

  • 6
    Wow. That's lucky! – Alexander Aug 21 '13 at 19:23
  • 1
    Oh, OK, so load is the CPU usage? – pje Sep 6 '14 at 20:21
  • this was so much a better solution! – Stephn_R Mar 18 '15 at 5:41
  • I tried in dd on Linux, it just echoes ^T to the terminal. – mwfearnley Jan 6 '17 at 14:48
  • 1
    make sure you are doing ctrl+shift+T in mac terminal – JBaczuk Aug 30 '17 at 15:31

For dd, you can send a signal. For other commands that are reading or writing to a file, you can watch their position in the file with lsof.

lsof -o -p1234    # where 1234 is the process ID of the command
lsof -o /path/to/file

If you plan in advance, pipe the data through pv.

  • 1
    pv looks amazing - I'm definitely going to use that next time. Thank you so much. – eckza Apr 14 '11 at 1:27
  • 1
    +1 - pv looks like just the ticket. – boehj Jul 13 '11 at 7:00

A more general way is to use iotop that displays the current amount of disk reading / writing per program.

EDIT: iotop -o show only programs which perform currently I/O operations (thanks Jason C for this comment).

  • 1
    This is my preferred quick check method as well. iotop -o will hide processes that are not doing IO and make it easier to tell at a glance what's going on. – Jason C Jun 4 '14 at 19:51

I usually attach strace to such a running process (with the -p $PID option) to see if it stays blocked in a system call or if it is still active.

Or, if you feel nervous about sending a signal to the running dd, start another dd to validate if this works.

  • 2
    How exactly would you go about attaching strace? Also, I did start another dd and send one of the suggested signals to it, and... it killed it. – eckza Apr 14 '11 at 13:15
  • 2
    If you know the pid of the running dd process, just do strace -p <pid>. You should see the log of all system calls called by the process (mostly read and write) – philfr Apr 14 '11 at 14:07
  • That's beautiful. Thank you so much. – eckza Apr 14 '11 at 14:10

For next time, you can just use pv from the start (if it's available through your package manager, install it). This is a utility with the sole purpose of piping input to output and monitoring progress and speed.

Then, for writing an image to a drive, say with 4MB block size:

pv -ptearb /path/to/image.bin | dd iflag=fullblock of=/dev/whatever bs=4M

Aside from initial buffering (offset by a final sync, which can be done through dd if you want), this will show you a progress bar, average speed, current speed, and ETA.

The iflag=fullblock option forces dd to grab full blocks of input through pv, otherwise you're at the mercy of the pipe for block sizes.

To go the other way use dd to read and pv to write, although you have to explicitly specify the size if the source is a block device. For a 4GB device:

dd if=/dev/whatever bs=4M | pv -ptearb -s 4096m > /path/to/image.bin

You could also determine the size automatically, something like:

dd if=/dev/whatever bs=4M | pv -ptearb -s `blockdev --getsize64 /dev/whatever` > /path/to/image.bin

It really doesn't matter what order you do dd and pv in, it's entirely performance-related -- if the device you are reading to or from has optimal performance for certain blocksizes you want to use dd instead of pv to access that device. You can even stick a dd on both ends if you want, or not at all if you don't care:

pv -ptearb /path/to/image.bin > /dev/whatever

As of coreutils v8.24, dd has native support for showing progress. Just add the option status=progress.


dd if=arch.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=4M status=progress


ddrescue will give you stats as it's running.

demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqq9A01geeA#t=144s

  • 3
    This might be helpful for the next time, but it won't help the OP to understand if the current command is frozen or not. – Francesco Turco Nov 2 '12 at 13:11

Sometimes you may not be able to use the INFO or USR1 signal because the stderr stream of the dd process is not accessible (e.g. because the terminal in which it was executed was already closed). In this case, a workaround is to do the following (tested on FreeBSD, may be slightly different on Linux):

  1. Use iostat to estimate the average write rate (MB/s) to the target device, e.g.:

    iostat -d -w30 ada0

    Substitute your target device name for ada0 here, and wait a minute for it to give a couple results. The "w" parameter determines how many seconds between samples. Increasing it will give a better average estimate with less variance, but you'll have to wait longer.

  2. Use ps to determine how long dd has been running:

    ps -xo etime,command | grep dd

    Convert this to seconds to get total seconds of runtime.

  3. Multiply total seconds of runtime by average write rate to get total transferred MB.
  4. Get the device size in MB with:

    grep ada0 /var/run/dmesg.boot

    Substitute your target device name for ada0. Divide the result by the average write rate to get the total transfer time in seconds. Subtract the time it's been running so far to get time remaining.

This strategy only works if dd has been writing continuously at the current average write rate since it began. If other processes are competing for the CPU or I/O resources (including the I/O bus) then it may reduce the transfer rate.

I started using dcfldd(1), which shows dd operations in a better way.

While dd is executing, I run this in another terminal as root:

while pgrep ^dd; do pkill -INFO dd; sleep 1; done

It prints the dd status every 1 second in the original terminal window where dd is executing, and quits when the command is done.

  • So cool. Worked fine here under El Capitan – Stefano Mtangoo Mar 9 '17 at 13:51

You can use progress which, in particular, shows the progress of a running dd. It uses /proc/$pid/fd and /proc/$pid/fdinfo which you can also monitor by hand.

The wchar line (written characters) in /proc/$pid/io can give you precise information about the dd process. As long as it changes, your dd is still working!

Here is a neat little php script, which you can save and then execute with php filename.php during the dd to display the written bytes. The nice benefit of watching /proc/$pid/io over kill -USR1 $(pidof dd) is that you do not have to switch between terminals, which is not always an option.


/** Time between refreshs in seconds */
$refresh = 1;

 * Start of Script 

if (!($pid = exec('pidof dd')))
    exit("no dd running\n");

$history = array();
$break_ms = $refresh * 1000000;
$start_time = exec("ls -ld /proc/$pid --time-style=+\"%s\" | egrep -o [0-9]{10}");

fprintf(STDOUT, "PID: %s\n", $pid);
fprintf(STDOUT, "START TIME: %s\n\n", date("Y-m-d H:i:s", $start_time));

while (true) {
    if (isset($curr))
        array_push($history, $curr);

    if (count($history) > 10) array_shift($history);
    $oldest = reset($history);
    $latest = end($history);

     * get number of written bytes from /proc/$pid/io
    #if (!($curr = exec("cat /proc/$pid/io | grep ^write_bytes | sed 's/write_bytes: //g'")))
    #    break;

    /* prepare proc_open() parameter */
    $descriptorspec = array(
        0 => array('pipe', 'r'), // stdin
        1 => array('pipe', 'w'), // stdout
        2 => array('pipe', 'w'), // stderr

    $process = proc_open("cat /proc/$pid/io | grep ^write_bytes | sed 's/write_bytes: //g'", $descriptorspec, $pipes);
    if (!is_resource($process)) break;

    $stdout = stream_get_contents($pipes[1]);
    $stderr = stream_get_contents($pipes[2]);

    if (!empty($stderr)) break;
    $curr = trim($stdout);

     * caculate elapsed time from start */
    $time_elapsed = time() - $start_time;

     * avg speed since start */
    $avg = $time_elapsed > 0 ? round($curr / $time_elapsed) : 0;

     * avg speed of last 10 updates */
    if (count($history) > 0)
        $speed = human_file_size(round(($latest - $oldest) / count($history) / $refresh));

    $output = sprintf("\rBYTES WRITTEN: %s [%s]  ::  CURRENT: %s/s  ::  AVERAGE: %s/s  ::  ELAPSED: %s", $curr, human_file_size($curr), isset($speed) ? $speed : 0, human_file_size($avg), gmdate("H:i:s", $time_elapsed));
    printf("%s%s", $output, str_repeat(" ", exec("tput cols") - strlen($output)));


fprintf(STDOUT, "\ndd has finished!\n\n");

function human_file_size($size,$unit="") {
  if( (!$unit && $size >= 1<<30) || $unit == "GB")
    return number_format($size/(1<<30),2)." GB";
  if( (!$unit && $size >= 1<<20) || $unit == "MB")
    return number_format($size/(1<<20),2)." MB";
  if( (!$unit && $size >= 1<<10) || $unit == "kB")
    return number_format($size/(1<<10),2)." kB";
  return number_format($size)." bytes";

protected by Community Jun 4 '14 at 20:34

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.