Like most users, I have a bunch of aliases set up to give a default set of flags for frequently used programs. For instance,

alias vim='vim -X'
alias grep='grep -E'
alias ls='ls -G'

The problem is that if I want to use which to see where my vim/grep/ls/etc is coming from, the alias gets in the way:

$ which vim
vim: aliased to vim -X

This is useful output, but not what I'm looking for in this case; I know vim is aliased to vim -X but I want to know where that vim is coming from.

Short of temporarily un-defining the alias just so I can use which on it, is there an easy way to have which 'unwrap' the alias and run itself on that?

Edit: It seems that which is a shell-builtin with different behaviors across different shells. In Bash, SiegeX's suggestion of the --skip-alias flag works; however, I'm on Zsh. Does something similar exist there?

  • 1
    in zsh, if you want to know where that vim is coming from, you'd use where vim Commented Aug 30, 2017 at 10:29

7 Answers 7


which is actually a bad way to do things like this, as it makes guesses about your environment based on $SHELL and the startup files (it thinks) that shell uses; not only does it sometimes guess wrong, but you can't generally tell it to behave differently. (which on my Ubuntu 10.10 doesn't understand --skip-alias as mentioned by @SiegeX, for example.) type uses the current shell environment instead of poking at your config files, and can be told to ignore parts of that environment, so it shows you what will actually happen instead of what would happen in a reconstruction of your default shell.

In this case, type -P will bypass any aliases or functions:

$ type -P vim

You can also ask it to peel off all the layers, one at a time, and show you what it would find:

$ type -a vim
vim is aliased to `vim -X'
vim is /usr/bin/vim

(Expanding on this from the comments:)

The problem with which is that it's usually an external program instead of a shell built-in, which means it can't see your aliases or functions and has to try to reconstruct them from the shell's startup/config files. (If it's a shell built-in, as it is in zsh but apparently not bash, it is more likely to use the shell's environment and do the right thing.)

type is a POSIX-compliant command which is required to behave as if it were a built-in (that is, it must use the environment of the shell it's invoked from including local aliases and functions), so it usually is a built-in.

It isn't generally found in csh/tcsh, although in most modern versions of those which is a shell builtin and does the right thing; sometimes the built-in is what instead, and sometimes there's no good way to see the current shell's environment from csh/tcsh at all.

  • 8
    Thanks! This is something very useful to add to my bag of tricks. I especially like that type -a seems to return all instances on your $PATH, not just the first one. I think I'll alias which to type :) Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 20:49
  • 2
    @ geekosaur: Thanks. If type is part of the POSIX standard then that is the way to go. To answer my question, type works on zsh too (on Debian). Why don't the distributions get rid of what and which if they aren't standardized and don't have extra functionality? Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 21:05
  • 1
    Nope, not even remotely.
    – geekosaur
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 21:07
  • 1
    @Faheem: re documentation, I'd start with info bash 'Bash builtins' on Linux, although you can also get it form the zsh reference manual. More officially, pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/type.html (which I note doesn't actually spec -P or -a, or even -p which was the original form of -P, but does require that it use the current shell environment).
    – geekosaur
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 21:23
  • 6
    type -p behaves differently between zsh and bash. type -P does not exist in zsh at all.
    – kojiro
    Commented Sep 23, 2016 at 20:04

In bash:

type -P vim

In zsh:

type -p vim

In both:

/usr/bin/which vim


( unalias vim; type vim )
  • 2
    Last one is cool. We can have an alias to do this. :)
    – balki
    Commented Jul 15, 2011 at 6:23
  • In bash on redhat I have to use type -P, and not which, if i want the correct answer. No aliases or functions are concerned.
    – user13757
    Commented Dec 1, 2017 at 14:44
  • Dr Eval, which "which"? Which Red Hat?
    – Mikel
    Commented Dec 1, 2017 at 22:15
  • @Mikel RH7.4. GNU which v2.20.
    – user13757
    Commented Dec 4, 2017 at 9:24
  • ++ /usr/bin/which is what I really wanted. Helped me realize which isn't even what I thought it was on zsh. Thanks! Commented Jan 12, 2023 at 15:56

In zsh which is a builtin as this command reports:

$ whence -w which
which: builtin

To execute the external command (in any shell) which, use the Full Path:

$ /bin/which ls; echo $?

thus the command ls was found (an exit value of 0), and is located at /bin/ls.

Inside zsh; a way (beside the one above) to search for external commands is:

$ whence -p ls

However, that will not resolve nested aliases like:

$ alias dire='ls -l'

The command will report that no dire command was found.

$ whence -p dire; echo $?

For resolving nested aliases (manually) see Resolve nested aliases to their source commands


Mine defined as such

alias which='alias | /usr/bin/which --tty-only --read-alias --show-dot --show-tilde'

Another alternative is command which vim, which works the same way in both zsh and bash

E.g. on my mac:

LOLcalhost :: ~ % command which grep
  • Ah fair enough. Commented Dec 5, 2015 at 0:50

Try the following:

which --skip-alias vim
  • 1
    Interesting! This works on Bash, but not on Zsh (I really didn't think this was going to be shell-dependent). This made me realize that which is actually a shell built-in and not a regular Unix utility as I had assumed. So I should edit my question and specify Zsh. Thanks for pointing this out to me! Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 20:37
  • which is not a builtin, at least not on Debian. It is a shell script, and part of debianutils, so works on zsh. However, --skip-alias is not an option the which on Debian. Are there different varieties of which floating around? This does not apppear to be a standardized command. Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 21:01
  • @Faheem Mitha: It is a zsh builtin. See man zshbuiltins. which [ -wpams ] name ... Equivalent to whence -c.
    – Mikel
    Commented Apr 2, 2011 at 22:03
  • Yeah on Xubuntu's bash, it is not a built-in and doesn't have the --skip-alias option.
    – polym
    Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 15:43
  • On CentOS (and RHEL?) 6, it's an executable /usr/bin/which plus an alias in /etc/profile.d that lets it handle aliases but --skip-alias works. As a result which which shows the alias, but command which which shows the executable! Commented Dec 4, 2015 at 1:58

Both type and which behave differently according to your shell type.

In bash, which is a command exists in PATH. It searches the command you provide in PATH. Bash builtin type -P (P for PATH) behaves exactly like which.

In ZSH, both which and type are builtins, and partial functions of builtin whence. which -p is what you want. It forces a path search. (-P option is not available for type ZSH.)

whence [ -vcwfpamsS ] [ -x num ] name ...


Do a path search for name even if it is an alias, reserved word, shell function or builtin.

More from ZSH manual.

which [ -wpamsS ] [ -x num ] name ...

Equivalent to whence -c.

To skip builtin which and force use command which from PATH in ZSH:

alias which="command which"

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .