network profile
|
Apr 28 |
comment |
How does coreutil's date manage to get such weird results? Thanks for finding this out! Do you know any shorter way to obtain the number of seconds of a duration like "2 days" with date? (e.g., an abbreviation for the epoch) |
|
Apr 28 |
accepted | How does coreutil's date manage to get such weird results? |
|
Apr 25 |
asked | How does coreutil's date manage to get such weird results? |
|
Apr 15 |
awarded | Good Answer |
|
Feb 19 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jul 20 |
comment |
How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? P.T.: I know about screen, but this is to run multiple occurrences of the program from a shell script for testing purposes, so using screen is a bit overkill. |
|
Jul 20 |
accepted | How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? |
|
Jul 20 |
comment |
How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? w00t: Did you mean "<&-"? Indeed, it makes the program terminate. Adding a switch is not a very elegant solution, because it feels like there should be a sensible way to reach the desired behavior by giving the adequate input to the program. |
|
Jul 13 |
comment |
How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? João Portela: This is a program I wrote, gitorious.org/irctk |
|
Jul 13 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jul 12 |
comment |
How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? From strace tail -f /dev/null it seems that tail uses inotify and that wakeups occur in silly cases like sudo touch /dev/null. It's sad that there seems to be no better solution... I wonder which would be the right syscall to use to implement a better solution. |
|
Jul 12 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jul 12 |
asked | How to do nothing forever in an elegant way? |
|
Jun 19 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Jun 18 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 11 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Nov 25 |
awarded | Necromancer |
|
Nov 25 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Jun 19 |
answered | Turn off buffering in pipe |
