network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 6 months |
| seen | Apr 6 at 14:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 2 |
|
Apr 6 |
revised |
How to make tar globbing work with the 'change directory' option previous command didn't work right |
|
Apr 6 |
answered | How to make tar globbing work with the 'change directory' option |
|
Apr 6 |
comment |
How to make tar globbing work with the 'change directory' option Indeed, if results.a.log exists in the directory from which the script is run, it works. But I don't understand why this happens, since -C stands for change directory, so the current directory should be the one with results.a.log. I can't accept your answer because you don't offer a solution. |
|
Apr 6 |
asked | How to make tar globbing work with the 'change directory' option |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Is there a reason why 'owner' permissions exist? Aren't group permissions enough? Excellent answer, and I enjoyed learning about older 'man's. However, I have some reservations about what you said. A simpler system, which can actually do almost (if not exactly) as much as ACLs, is let each of the 'rwx' permissions carry a group (rather than the other way around). That is, you'll have a read group, a write group and an execute group. If really needed for OS purposes, you can attach an owner to the file. That way you can also specify a special 'owner' group and an 'everyone' group. Other than hierarchy, I think this covers everything, including simplicity and orthogonality. |
|
Nov 13 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 13 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Nov 13 |
accepted | Is there a reason why 'owner' permissions exist? Aren't group permissions enough? |
|
Nov 13 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Nov 13 |
revised |
Is there a reason why 'owner' permissions exist? Aren't group permissions enough? corrected "but a group/owner scheme scheme will not suffice" to "...group/other...". |
|
Nov 13 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Nov 12 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 12 |
asked | Is there a reason why 'owner' permissions exist? Aren't group permissions enough? |
