110 reputation
5
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 8 months
seen Mar 17 at 22:48

Feb
28
comment Who is behind LXLE?
@terdon At least with Debian, there is a highly structured organization behind it, and ample information about how it is run and who is running it. (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Organization). I have not found similar information about LXLE-- but maybe that is because it is so new. The question is not so much about the business model as who is running it. You are correct that it is not about using LXLE. If that means it is off topic, I apologize.
Feb
28
comment Who is behind LXLE?
@terdon I guess it is just hard for me to imagine how it would work otherwise. Someone needs to make decisions about what will be included and what will not; someone had to make the decision to organize the effort; the founders of the distro will want some control over the direction it takes, and some protection from personal legal liability. The quality of the web site and its forum suggests that there are full time developers working on it. All of this to me sounds like there must some company behind it.
Feb
28
asked Who is behind LXLE?
Sep
11
accepted iptables change log
Sep
10
asked iptables change log
Jul
9
awarded  Popular Question
May
22
comment When does the Puppy linux security model make sense?
I don't see how running everything as root makes it more secure. If you are running a browser as root (especially one that has not been updated with the latest patches) and visit some infected web site that exploits a security flaw in your browser, then you have just given the attacker full control over your system. You might not even be aware that it has happened. In what sense does being root help you in this case?
Oct
23
answered When does the Puppy linux security model make sense?
Oct
23
comment When does the Puppy linux security model make sense?
+1 for the useful reply, though I am not sure I agree with all of it. Puppy linux does not seem to present itself as a toy distro-- there are no warnings to treat it as such.
Aug
28
awarded  Scholar
Aug
28
accepted Set starting directory for gnome-terminal profile
Aug
28
comment Set starting directory for gnome-terminal profile
Awesome! Thanks!
Aug
28
asked Set starting directory for gnome-terminal profile
Aug
26
awarded  Supporter
Aug
26
comment When does the Puppy linux security model make sense?
Thanks for the informed reply. Two follow up questions: 1) If you are running behind a firewall (e.g. a router with NAT) then the primary means of attack would be through visited web sites, wouldn't it? 2) Even if the hard drives are unmounted, malware installed via web browsing could remount them, couldn't it, since the web browser is running as root? I was just reading some reports of attacks where, apparently via Puppy browsing activity, the Windows OS on the system was infected.
Aug
25
awarded  Student
Aug
25
comment The command to upgrade to a new kernel from Ubuntu repositories
I am using 10.04, so the menus might have changed. "Update Manager" is the only way I have tried done updates (including kernel updates) in Ubuntu. There is a Settings button in Update Manager that lets you set how often it checks for updates (though I have mine set for daily, because if there is a security vulnerability I want it patched yesterday) and you can also tell it to install security patches automatically, and to only look for "important security updates". I do still see the update manager window occasionally, but it shows up minimized.
Aug
25
awarded  Teacher
Aug
25
answered The command to upgrade to a new kernel from Ubuntu repositories
Aug
25
asked When does the Puppy linux security model make sense?