network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | May 20 at 9:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
Triple compression and I only save 1% in space? Every time I've used xs it's given a lot better compression, but a lot slower to compress. For example 50% to 25% but 20 seconds to 4 minutes (on text). |
|
Oct 8 |
comment |
What happens when you delete a hard link? The key is that creating the text file also adds a hard link. In *NIX filesystems, all files (inodes) must be hardlinked at least once into the directory structure. |
|
Oct 8 |
comment |
What happens when you delete a hard link? @cjm Opening a file adds a new hardlink in /proc. The same logic then appiles. |
|
Sep 19 |
comment |
Why can rm remove read-only files? @Magnus then don't use rm -f, yes | rm or rm <yes |
|
Aug 14 |
comment |
How can I get a static C compiler? @Gilles The best way to get a C compiler as a standalone binary is to build it from source using a complier you already have. |
|
Aug 14 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? And on an HPUX box it's /opt/ansic/bin/cc. |
|
Aug 14 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? Just checked a couple of Solaris boxes, and /usr/bin/cc links to /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc on one and /opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/cc on the other. Regardless, it's still a C compiler. |
|
Aug 14 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? @BruceEdiger learning how fork() works includes learning that it can copy buffered output. Being a reasonably complicated system call, some confusion is probably necessary in the learning process. |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? @BruceEdiger Why the need for _exit? What's wrong with doing any cleanup that's been registered? |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? Just a note that the tools I named are not the only ones available, but are likely to be available by default on a GNU/Linux system and are widely used. |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Why can't I run this C program? If "compiler" is part of the name of the tool, I would call that reasonably explicit. |
