network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Naples, Florida | |
| age | 26 | |
| visits | member for | 10 months |
| seen | Dec 17 '12 at 22:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
SDE@Amazon.com
|
Feb 4 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Nov 12 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jul 6 |
comment |
Pipe find into grep -v Wow this is even better. I was using 'extends(/s)+SomethingSomething' which seemed to work as far as I could tell. Is there any difference with this syntax with the one specified in the Extended RegEx version? |
|
Jul 5 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jul 5 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jul 5 |
accepted | Pipe find into grep -v |
|
Jul 5 |
comment |
Pipe find into grep -v Oh wow, thanks! That worked! |
|
Jul 5 |
comment |
Pipe find into grep -v This works but not with the negation part(e.g. when i add -v or -vi). |
|
Jul 5 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jul 5 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jul 5 |
revised |
Pipe find into grep -v added 284 characters in body |
|
Jul 5 |
comment |
Pipe find into grep -v I tried your modifications and I'm still not getting the result I am expecting. I'll try updating the question to make it clearer. |
|
Jul 5 |
asked | Pipe find into grep -v |
