Reputation
33,275
Next tag badge:
357/400 score
91/80 answers
Badges
4 85 123
Newest
 Enlightened
Impact
~2.6m people reached

Aug
26
comment Is there a program that can send me a notification e-mail when a process finishes?
@Theo no you can't. Even in the background the process is still a child of your shell and if the shell dies the child process will receive a kill signal. You could use nohup to unlink them, but you also lose the ability to continue controlling it from the shell. This is partially what tmux is for. It divorces the running processes from your actively connected and viewed terminal session while still letting you interact with them normally.
Aug
23
comment Is there a plain GNU/Linux OS?
This is likely to confuse the OP. Not only is Linux 0.1 not a distribution, it is not an operating system. The OP wants to know what the original linux looked like and this doesn't set the record straight that there is nothing to look at.
Aug
7
awarded  Enlightened
Aug
6
awarded  Nice Answer
Aug
6
awarded  Great Answer
Aug
5
awarded  Popular Question
Jun
26
comment Is collectd able to send data tagged as a host other than itself?
The reason I asked this question is because you can't override hostname on a per plugin basis the way you speculate.
Jun
19
comment Is collectd able to send data tagged as a host other than itself?
@ManishRanjan A this point this doesn't look like a "how do I use this" question so much as a feature request; so I have submitted an issue on collectd's bug tracker. You might want to subscribe to and show some interest in that issue so it gets a developer's attention.
Jun
18
comment Is collectd able to send data tagged as a host other than itself?
@ManishRanjan No I never got an answer on this and still don't have a solution.
Jun
18
awarded  Good Answer
Jun
16
comment What specific vulnerabilities am I creating by disabling the sudo password?
-1 for the dangerous suggestion that allowing an editor to run as root can't hurt the system. At that point you might as well let anything run as root because an editor session enables arbitrary code execution anyway.
Jun
13
reviewed Approve Debian 8 - Update Iptables on boot
Jun
13
comment How to set HOSTNAME in zsh?
@Anthon The features and syntax of the ZSH prompt are not particularly portable to other shells anyway. In this context why would you not just use the variable that ZSH expects and has setup for you? Why set another one at all? Incidentally using HOSTNAME in this context does cause a portability problem if you try to pass your prompt off on somebody else. They would need to setup their profile to match your variable renaming rather than just being able to drop in usage of HOME.
Jun
13
comment How to set HOSTNAME in zsh?
If you want HOSTNAME to be set you should get your system to do it properly. The shell's rc file is not the best place for that and if you don't want to depend on the system the shell has a proper environment variable for you to use ready to go without this hack.
Jun
13
answered How to set HOSTNAME in zsh?
Jun
10
comment X11 forwarding but open links locally
A quick two step hack would be to setup your default remote browser to be a script that simply dumped the link to stdout, then any time you open a remote link you just have to click on it in the terminal window.
Jun
5
awarded  Nice Answer
May
30
revised Linux: allowing an user to listen to a port below 1024
edited body
May
30
comment Linux: allowing an user to listen to a port below 1024
@BT You're missing more than half the picture here. Allowing non-privileged users to start up daemons on standardized low-port service locations is a much larger issue than the minor inconvenience of having to configure ways for give users the privileges they need. Contrary to your comment, you do NOT need to (and should not) give root access to users just because they need to start a service on port 80. And any system that doesn't require admin rights to start services on port 80 shouldn't be forward-facing anyway—that's just asking for trouble.
May
12
awarded  Good Answer