network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | May 3 at 16:34 | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
|
May 1 |
accepted | What is happening when a script encounters an error in one of the commands? |
|
May 1 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
May 1 |
comment |
What is happening when a script encounters an error in one of the commands? So . . . are you saying that the else branch still successfully executes, thus setting the value of ECHO_ESC? |
|
May 1 |
comment |
What is happening when a script encounters an error in one of the commands? Ah. Debian uses dash now. Thanks for the great answer. |
|
May 1 |
revised |
What is happening when a script encounters an error in one of the commands? fixed tagging |
|
May 1 |
asked | What is happening when a script encounters an error in one of the commands? |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Why won't my binary run? @Gilles I don't understand removing the UPDATE . . . without it, the question reads a bit funny, like "I don't know anything . . . here's the strace" Know what I mean? |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Why won't my binary run? Did you see the update? I think you were right, and there was no error . . . unless it was in a log I didn't know to look in. |
|
Jan 7 |
accepted | Why won't my binary run? |
|
Jan 7 |
revised |
Why won't my binary run? added 1080 characters in body |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Why won't my binary run? It's a bitrock installer. I build it from their toolkit. It's supposed to run an interactive installer program. I'll check out strace. |
|
Jan 7 |
asked | Why won't my binary run? |
|
Nov 27 |
revised |
Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? clarified the answer |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? So, I looked in those logs ;) and I found out that my GLX support was broken in my proprietary NVIDIA driver. I reinstalled the very same version of the driver, and it works. I suppose some dependency of the NVIDIA driver changed, and it needed to be reinstalled; I guess being installed by the binary installer doesn't allow for awareness of shifting dependencies, as would be the case if the thing was installed via the debian package management system. |
|
Nov 27 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 27 |
accepted | Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? |
|
Nov 27 |
suggested | suggested edit on Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? |
|
Nov 27 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? I'm not accepting your answer until I see if it provides a solution though . . . |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
Gnome 3 “broken” after upgrades, kind of looks like gnome 2 . . .? This is good info. I believe it is fallback mode, though I'll have to verify that. I did see some complaints about my nvidia driver in the logs, but those seem to be in much older logs too . . . I'll do some more looking. Thanks. |
