Tag Info

New answers tagged

0

The answer here (and provided links) suggest that lld was removed back in LLVM 3.2. It doesn't have a future. Use GNU ld or gold instead. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17779958/llvm-ld-still-exist-for-clang-3-4 It should really be removed from the main LLVM page as #13 (http://llvm.org/), or put in some archive section or something.



Top 50 recent answers are included