Take the 2-minute tour ×
Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question builds on a previous question, Can Tor connections between hidden services be aggregated using ifenslave? (… and might Mevade be doing this?).

In researching that, I came across VPN Bonding, which explains how to bond multiple SSH tunnels with ifenslave in balance-rr mode. And so I decided to try bonding multiple OpenVPN-through-Tor tunnels in that way.

I installed OpenVPN in the workstation of one Whonix 7 instance, and created a certificate authority. I then generated certificates and keys for several OpenVPN servers, and for one client each. Next I created configuration files, and verified that the servers were running (on ports 5000, 5001, etc). Then, in the gateway, I created a hidden service for each OpenVPN server.

Next, I installed OpenVPN in the workstation of another Whonix 7 instance, and set up the OpenVPN clients, pointing them to the corresponding hidden services. They all came up, with 1-2 second pings. However, I've had no luck usefully bonding them with ifenslave.

I can create bond0 on each end, using mode "balance-rr". Running ifconfig shows the new bond0 interface, and all component tun interfaces report "UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP SLAVE MULTICAST". I see no errors in /var/log/messages, just the expected "Adding slave tun*" and "enslaving tun* as an active interface with an up link" messages. But ping fails on the bonded link.

I did add "loop, lp, rtc and bonding" to /etc/modules. However, lsmod only showed three of them (loop, lp and bonding). Could the missing rtc be problematic?

Or perhaps it's more likely that ifenslave simply can't bond interfaces with 1-2 second latency, and ~0.5 second jitter.

Is there any hope for joy here?

share|improve this question
You might have luck messing with some of the timing parameters that the bonding infrastructure provides. I suspect that this is more of a linux/networking question than a Tor question. –  weasel - Peter Palfrader Nov 1 '13 at 9:01
add comment

migrated from tor.stackexchange.com Nov 1 '13 at 13:48

This question came from our site for researchers, developers, and users of Tor.

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.